IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/asu/wpaper/2149162.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring Consumer Welfare Using Statistical Demands

Author

Abstract

The equivalent or compensating variation for a price increase is often calculated using the expenditure function from a statistical (i.e. estimated) demand. If the regression errors are due to unobserved heterogeneity, then the variation from the statistical demand does not generally equal the mean variation for households, resulting in inconsistent estimates. We give conditions ensuring that the compensating variation from the statistical demand i) equals the mean compensating variation; ii) bounds the mean compensating variation; iii) is closer to the mean compensating variation than the change in consumers' surplus from the statistical demand. A necessary condition for ii) is that demands become more dispersed as income rises (for each class of households with the same demographic characteristics and income). This plausible necessary condition is not sufficient for either ii) or iii). If however we can write the indirect utility function for each household in the class as additively separable in income and the preference type, then increasing dispersion is equivalent to ii) and implies iii) if the good is normal. If household preferences are random, then the indirect (von Neumann-Morgenstern) utility function must be additive separability in income and the preference type if the compensating variation from the mean demand is even a first-order approximation to the ex ante compensating variation; consumers' surplus can easily be a better approximation when additive separability fails.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward Schlee, "undated". "Measuring Consumer Welfare Using Statistical Demands," Working Papers 2149162, Department of Economics, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:asu:wpaper:2149162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wpcarey.asu.edu/tools/mytools/pubs_admin/FILES/ConsWelfare(9-04).pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asu:wpaper:2149162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Steve Salik). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/deasuus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.