IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2611.01829.html

Same Text, Different Filename: Are LLM Judges Biased?

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey V. Popov

Abstract

Yes. In 2026, leading economic journals started using Refine.ink in the technical quality assessment of submissions before publication. I study whether renaming a file changes the perception of the document's quality by LLM judges. I find that three frontier LLMs score the same document differently if you change the document's filename. A person-related label scores higher than no label; there is no consistent preference of own- or rival-based label, nor a penalty for an Asian name, but there is a context-specific bias in assessments whose direction and size vary with both document and label. With LLM-written documents, some self-premium can be detected, but a significant context-dependent label bias remains. Whether to combat it is a question of the costs of evaluation errors.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey V. Popov, 2026. "Same Text, Different Filename: Are LLM Judges Biased?," Papers 2611.01829, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2611.01829
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2611.01829
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2611.01829. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.