IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.36274.html

Does Ecosystem Activity Validate TVL?

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Brigida

Abstract

Total value locked (TVL) is widely used to assess decentralized finance ecosystems. Prior evidence finds that portfolios formed on TVL alone are spanned by the crypto market portfolio (Brigida 2025). This paper asks whether TVL becomes more informative when combined with measures of adoption, usage, development, protocol revenue, or social attention. I construct weekly value-weighted 2x3 portfolios that independently sort tokens on TVL-to-market-cap and one of seven ecosystem-activity ratios. Portfolio returns are computed from token prices using lagged-market-capitalization weights and evaluated against crypto market and size factors. Across the available 2022-2025 samples, none of the six on-chain double sorts rejects the benchmark after controlling for multiple testing. The same conclusion holds over 83 common weeks for which social-attention data are available. Several specifications reject at unadjusted levels, but none survives Holm adjustment. The social-attention rejection is only marginal under asymptotic inference and is insignificant under a moving-block bootstrap. Equal-weighted portfolios and formal parameter-stability tests lead to the same broad conclusion. The evidence therefore does not show that ecosystem activity reliably transforms TVL into an incremental return signal.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Brigida, 2026. "Does Ecosystem Activity Validate TVL?," Papers 2610.36274, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.36274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.36274
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.36274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.