IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.36093.html

Testing strong exogeneity in proxy SVARs with internal synthetic proxies

Author

Listed:
  • Sascha A. Keweloh
  • Shu Wang

Abstract

Proxy SVARs often rely on a single credible proxy, leaving proxy exogeneity untestable. Narrative arguments used to justify proxy validity imply a stronger form of exogeneity. We formalize the strong exogeneity assumption and propose a corresponding test based on internal synthetic proxies. The approach uses the external proxy to locate the target-shock direction in the reduced-form innovations and synthesize the candidate shock into an additional internal synthetic proxies, which allows to test the joint exogeneity of the original and internal synthetic proxy. We derive the large-sample theory for the ISP test and show that the identification strength is governed by a direct measure of the target shock's non-Gaussianity. We study weak identification under asymptotic Gaussianity and develop an identification-robust version of the test. Monte Carlo experiments demonstrate the favorable power of the test when the proxy has a low signal-to-noise ratio. Applications to monetary policy and oil supply news shocks find no evidence against the exogeneity of the benchmark proxies.

Suggested Citation

  • Sascha A. Keweloh & Shu Wang, 2026. "Testing strong exogeneity in proxy SVARs with internal synthetic proxies," Papers 2610.36093, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.36093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.36093
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.36093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.