IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.31106.html

Testing for peer effects in short panels without identifying the network structure

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Boot
  • Art=uras Juodis

Abstract

We propose an instrument-based test for peer effects in short-T panels when the underlying network is unknown. The test avoids estimating the network by aggregating pairwise comparisons between covariate-projected outcomes of potential peers and residualized own outcomes. The statistic is designed for fixed-T, large-N settings with individual fixed effects, heterogeneous slopes, heteroskedasticity, and serial dependence within units. We also develop a weighted extension that accounts for additive common time effects. The limiting distribution is standard Gaussian when the norm of the projected component of the outcomes is bounded away from zero, but can be nonstandard when it is local to zero. We derive a conditional Gaussian limit experiment and a feasible conditional Monte Carlo procedure to obtain uniformly valid critical values. Monte Carlo evidence shows that the conditional procedure leads to accurate size control while retaining power against latent peer-effect alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Boot & Art=uras Juodis, 2026. "Testing for peer effects in short panels without identifying the network structure," Papers 2610.31106, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.31106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.31106
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.31106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.