IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.30956.html

Risk Sensitivity and Stationary Equilibrium in Incomplete Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Qingyin Ma
  • John Stachurski
  • Bin Wu

Abstract

We study stationary equilibrium and comparative statics in an incomplete market economy with risk-sensitive preferences. We provide conditions under which a stationary equilibrium exists for every nonnegative degree of risk sensitivity. Under independent income, greater risk sensitivity strictly raises aggregate saving at fixed prices unless both economies have zero saving, and strictly lowers the smallest and the largest equilibrium interest rates. Under stochastically monotone Markov income, these comparisons hold whenever one of the two levels of risk sensitivity being compared is sufficiently low or sufficiently high. For pairs of intermediate values, however, greater risk sensitivity can strictly lower saving, contrary to an existing result in the literature, and can strictly raise the smallest and largest equilibrium rates. An exact decomposition identifies the forces driving these reversals.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingyin Ma & John Stachurski & Bin Wu, 2026. "Risk Sensitivity and Stationary Equilibrium in Incomplete Markets," Papers 2610.30956, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.30956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.30956
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.30956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.