Market Regime-Based Multi-Asset Portfolio Optimization Using Nested Clustered Optimization for Tactical Asset Allocation

We investigate the interaction between market regime detection and Nested Clustered Optimization (NCO) for tactical asset allocation across heterogeneous multi-asset portfolios. The central empirical question is whether conditioning the NCO pipeline, encompassing covariance estimation, hierarchical clustering, and weight allocation, on latent market states genuinely enhances risk-adjusted performance, or conversely, whether estimation uncertainty within regime-filtered sub-samples induces severe turnover and performance drag. We implement a causal rolling Gaussian Hidden Markov Model (HMM) coupled with an adaptive rebalancing mechanism that distinguishes regime shifts from portfolio weight drift. The framework is evaluated on a monthly Indonesian multi-asset universe comprising sovereign bond yields (SBN), the LQ45 equity index, spot gold (XAU/IDR), foreign exchange (CNY/IDR), and Bitcoin (BTC/IDR) across a 56-month out-of-sample period (January 2021 to August 2025). Rigorous walk-forward backtesting reveals that standard regime-agnostic NCO achieves remarkable capital preservation and risk-adjusted efficiency, delivering a 29.97% cumulative return (5.78% annualized), a maximum drawdown of only 2.18%, a Calmar ratio of 2.65, and low monthly turnover of 5.41%. In contrast, conditioning NCO on an unconstrained HMM in a small multi-asset universe amplifies parameter estimation noise and induces excessive rebalancing (47 events; 24.58% average monthly turnover), which erodes net cumulative return to 1.60% and increases drawdown to 9.99%. These findings demonstrate that without explicit transition persistence or asymmetric downside objectives, regime-switching frameworks can degrade rather than improve clustered portfolio stability, establishing crucial empirical boundaries for machine learning asset allocation.