IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.24230.html

Search and Matching without Reciprocity

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Bonneton
  • Christopher Sandmann

Abstract

We study equilibrium sorting in the canonical search-and-matching model with Nash bargaining and ex-ante and ex-post heterogeneity. Under standard conditions for assortative matching under search, match surplus retains two properties of Becker's frictionless benchmark---single-crossing and single-peakedness---but necessarily loses the third, reciprocity. Instead, search generates consensus: intervals of types share the same surplus-maximizing partner. For such intervals, mismatched pairs are more likely to match, conditional on meeting, than perfectly assortative ones. Two forces drive this: with search, outside options rise less than one-for-one with productivity and fall more for agents with fewer suitable partners. Globally, upper contour sets of the match-probability surface are lattices below an endogenous threshold but almost never above it. This means that MLRP fails for some log-concave survival function.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Bonneton & Christopher Sandmann, 2026. "Search and Matching without Reciprocity," Papers 2610.24230, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.24230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.24230
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.24230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.