IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.23901.html

Disentangling Liquidity-Constrained from Strategic Default: A Deep Learning Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Arka P. Bandyopadhyay

Abstract

I use a deep neural network (DNN) on a proprietary panel of commercial mortgages spanning 1998--2021 to separate liquidity-constrained default from strategic default -- two competing, observationally similar explanations for delinquency that are difficult to disentangle with standard parametric models. Conditional on delinquency, property income (net operating income, or NOI) is a more important determinant of the default rate than leverage (loan-to-value, or LTV), despite LTV's status as the workhorse variable in the commercial mortgage default literature. I recover borrower motive from otherwise observationally equivalent delinquency states through a joint analysis of default rates across NOI and LTV buckets, and show that the resulting thresholds are stable across the 2008 financial crisis and the 2020--2021 COVID-19 shock to commercial real estate. Because commercial borrowers are firms rather than households, and because responsibility for a missed payment is diffused across an organization rather than borne by a single decision-maker, the moral and reputational frictions that discourage strategic default in the residential setting are attenuated -- making commercial mortgages a setting in which strategic behavior should be comparatively easier to detect, and comparatively costly to ignore for investors, servicers, and regulators.

Suggested Citation

  • Arka P. Bandyopadhyay, 2026. "Disentangling Liquidity-Constrained from Strategic Default: A Deep Learning Approach," Papers 2610.23901, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.23901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.23901
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.23901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.