IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2609.12987.html

Demand Estimation with Variable Choice Sets: A Likelihood Correction for Nested Logit

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew J. Baker
  • Lisa M. George

Abstract

We derive the exact likelihood of the Berry (1994) share-form nested logit and show it contains a Jacobian term that depends on nest size and the nesting parameter. Omitting the term biases within-nest substitution estimates wherever choice sets vary across markets. Commonly-used count instruments for the within-nest share fail exclusion when product counts enter demand directly. The corrected likelihood identifies substitution without them, making crowding estimable. We apply the estimator to Medicare Advantage plan proliferation after 2019 elimination of the ``meaningful difference'' requirement. Estimates indicate plan proliferation raised consumer surplus in most markets, but ignoring crowding overstates the gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew J. Baker & Lisa M. George, 2026. "Demand Estimation with Variable Choice Sets: A Likelihood Correction for Nested Logit," Papers 2609.12987, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.12987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.12987
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.12987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.