IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.28866.html

Scrutiny and Conservatism

Author

Listed:
  • Paul H. Y. Cheung
  • Zichang Wang

Abstract

We study a setting in which an agent receives private information before choosing from a menu and anticipates hindsight scrutiny. Such scrutiny creates a motive for conservatism toward menu expansions. Our key axiom, conservatism, is a direct weakening of preference for flexibility: Adding an option is weakly beneficial whenever it leaves the menu's hindsight benchmark unchanged. Together with standard axioms, conservatism characterizes a scrutiny representation of preferences over menus in which the agent behaves as if she evaluates each menu by subtracting anticipated scrutiny from the material value of informed choice. Menu preference identifies a unique minimum pair of private information and scrutiny intensity, while incorporating subsequent stochastic-choice data pins down the actual pair. Applications to medical liability and corporate innovation illustrate the implications of our model for accountability design.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul H. Y. Cheung & Zichang Wang, 2026. "Scrutiny and Conservatism," Papers 2608.28866, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.28866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.28866
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.28866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.