IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.26106.html

A Statistical-Finance Benchmark for Same-Day Directional Stock Prediction: Walk-Forward Evidence from SPY

Author

Listed:
  • Alex Chen

Abstract

We study statistical predictability in daily U.S. equity prices using only information available at the market open. Using SPY from February 1, 1993 through March 15, 2024, we benchmark XGBoost against Random Forest, LightGBM, Logistic Regression, and naive baselines under expanding-window walk-forward validation. After observing the current day's opening price and two lagged target-specific prices, the task is to predict whether the same day's close will be above or below the previous day's close. On the last 800 trading days, Logistic Regression attains the highest close-direction accuracy (71.09%), Random Forest reaches 61.20%, and XGBoost reaches 58.45% with a 95% bootstrap confidence interval of [54.94%, 62.08]. For XGBoost, close-direction accuracy rises to 72.7% when the predicted move exceeds 1%, but the usable sample falls to 154 observations. We also report Diebold-Mariano and McNemar tests, regime-specific results, SHAP feature importance, and an auxiliary 541-equity screen. The evidence supports a narrow statistical-finance conclusion: simple daily equity features contain detectable same-day directional information, but the result should be interpreted with careful sample-size accounting and limited economic claims.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex Chen, 2026. "A Statistical-Finance Benchmark for Same-Day Directional Stock Prediction: Walk-Forward Evidence from SPY," Papers 2608.26106, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.26106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.26106
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.26106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.