IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.21506.html

What Quantitative Risk Modellers Can Learn from Durkheim's Study of Suicide

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmood Alaghmandan

Abstract

Emile Durkheim's Suicide: A Study in Sociology (1897) predates much of the statistical machinery that quantitative modellers now take for granted. Yet, working with sparse and imperfect observational data, Durkheim repeatedly arrives at practices that remain remarkably relevant to modern modelling. This paper revisits Suicide from the perspective of quantitative risk modelling, not for its substantive conclusions, but for the reasoning by which Durkheim reached them. His approach illustrates how careful definition, common sense, logical investigation, scepticism toward convenient explanations, and close attention to what the data can and cannot support---all of which must precede, and can often substitute for, statistical sophistication. The broader lesson is simple: good modelling begins not with technique, but with understanding the problem, interrogating the evidence, and reasoning carefully about what it can actually tell us.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmood Alaghmandan, 2026. "What Quantitative Risk Modellers Can Learn from Durkheim's Study of Suicide," Papers 2608.21506, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.21506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.21506
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.21506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.