IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.14323.html

Dependence-Informed Sparse Neural Architecture for Stock Return Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Hongyu Lin
  • Yulin Chen
  • Yuanrong Wang
  • Antonio Briola
  • Tomaso Aste

Abstract

Using neural networks for stock return prediction typically requires choices about depth and hidden-layer width that are difficult to connect to financial interpretation. We study an alternative: estimate dependence among firm characteristics with a Maximally Filtered Clique Forest (MFCF), then map its clique structure to a Homological Neural Network (HNN). The MFCF maximum clique size K is the only parameter controlling architectural complexity, and it has a clear graphical meaning: it bounds the number of characteristics in each maximal clique and hence the highest interaction order the network can represent. The filtered graph then fixes the neural network's depth, layer widths, and sparse connections before training, in place of a separately chosen depth and width sequence. We apply two HNN variants to annual out-of-sample forecasts of U.S. stock excess returns from 1987 to 2016 using 94 firm characteristics. The HNN models match a three-hidden-layer benchmark on pooled predictive accuracy, rank the cross-section more accurately, and use roughly 80 times fewer parameters than a fully connected network with the same induced layer widths. Two structural ablations indicate that both the sparse connectivity and the estimated grouping of characteristics contribute to the ranking advantage, and both effects remain significant after correcting for multiple testing. These findings show that HNNs offer a practical and interpretable way to incorporate estimated dependence among firm characteristics into neural architecture design.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongyu Lin & Yulin Chen & Yuanrong Wang & Antonio Briola & Tomaso Aste, 2026. "Dependence-Informed Sparse Neural Architecture for Stock Return Prediction," Papers 2608.14323, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.14323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.14323
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luyang Chen & Markus Pelger & Jason Zhu, 2024. "Deep Learning in Asset Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 714-750, February.
    2. R. Mantegna, 1999. "Hierarchical structure in financial markets," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 11(1), pages 193-197, September.
    3. Shihao Gu & Bryan Kelly & Dacheng Xiu, 2020. "Empirical Asset Pricing via Machine Learning," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 33(5), pages 2223-2273.
    4. Guanhao Feng & Stefano Giglio & Dacheng Xiu, 2020. "Taming the Factor Zoo: A Test of New Factors," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(3), pages 1327-1370, June.
    5. Doron Avramov & Si Cheng & Lior Metzker, 2023. "Machine Learning vs. Economic Restrictions: Evidence from Stock Return Predictability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2587-2619, May.
    6. Kozak, Serhiy & Nagel, Stefan & Santosh, Shrihari, 2020. "Shrinking the cross-section," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 271-292.
    7. Eugene F. Fama & Kenneth R. French, 2008. "Dissecting Anomalies," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 63(4), pages 1653-1678, August.
    8. Joachim Freyberger & Andreas Neuhierl & Michael Weber & Andrew KarolyiEditor, 2020. "Dissecting Characteristics Nonparametrically," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(5), pages 2326-2377.
    9. Whitney Newey & Kenneth West, 2014. "A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix," Applied Econometrics, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 33(1), pages 125-132.
    10. Gu, Shihao & Kelly, Bryan & Xiu, Dacheng, 2021. "Autoencoder asset pricing models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 429-450.
    11. Kelly, Bryan T. & Pruitt, Seth & Su, Yinan, 2019. "Characteristics are covariances: A unified model of risk and return," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(3), pages 501-524.
    12. Shihao Gu & Bryan Kelly & Dacheng Xiu, 2020. "Empirical Asset Pricing via Machine Learning," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(5), pages 2223-2273.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Changeun Kim & Younwoo Jeong & Bong-Gyu Jang, 2025. "Interpretable Deep Learning for Stock Returns: A Consensus-Bottleneck Asset Pricing Model," Papers 2512.16251, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    2. Doron Avramov & Si Cheng & Lior Metzker, 2023. "Machine Learning vs. Economic Restrictions: Evidence from Stock Return Predictability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2587-2619, May.
    3. Zhao, Yu & Lin, Sen & Kong, Ao, 2026. "Reconciling interpretability and accuracy: Evidence from categorical factors," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Cakici, Nusret & Fieberg, Christian & Metko, Daniel & Zaremba, Adam, 2023. "Machine learning goes global: Cross-sectional return predictability in international stock markets," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    5. De Nard, Gianluca & Zhao, Zhao, 2023. "Using, taming or avoiding the factor zoo? A double-shrinkage estimator for covariance matrices," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 23-35.
    6. Cong, Lin William & Feng, Guanhao & He, Jingyu & He, Xin, 2025. "Growing the efficient frontier on panel trees," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Fieberg, Christian & Liedtke, Gerrit & Zaremba, Adam & Cakici, Nusret, 2025. "A factor model for the cross-section of country equity risk premia," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    8. Wolfgang Drobetz & Tizian Otto, 2021. "Empirical asset pricing via machine learning: evidence from the European stock market," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(7), pages 507-538, December.
    9. Cakici, Nusret & Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Będowska-Sójka, Barbara & Zaremba, Adam, 2024. "Machine learning and the cross-section of cryptocurrency returns," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    10. Bell, Sebastian & Kakhbod, Ali & Lettau, Martin & Nazemi, Abdolreza, 2026. "Glass box machine learning and corporate bond returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    11. Zhipeng Liao & Yan Liu & Zhenzhen Xie, 2024. "Optimal Cross-Sectional Regression," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7911-7942, November.
    12. Yuxiao Jiao & Guofu Zhou & Wu Zhu & Yingzi Zhu, 2025. "Interpretable Factors of Firm Characteristics," Papers 2508.02253, arXiv.org.
    13. Yan, Jingda & Yu, Jialin, 2023. "Cross-stock momentum and factor momentum," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(2).
    14. Lin William Cong & Guanhao Feng & Jingyu He & Xin He, 2022. "Growing the Efficient Frontier on Panel Trees," NBER Working Papers 30805, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Fang, Yvonne & Hu, Xiaolu & Zhong, Angel & Pan, Zheyao & Cao, Youdan, 2026. "Machine learning in corporate bonds: Evidence from China," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Matteo Bagnara, 2024. "Asset Pricing and Machine Learning: A critical review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 27-56, February.
    17. Söhnke M. Bartram & Harald Lohre & Peter F. Pope & Ananthalakshmi Ranganathan, 2021. "Navigating the factor zoo around the world: an institutional investor perspective," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(5), pages 655-703, July.
    18. Ai He & Guofu Zhou, 2023. "Diagnostics for asset pricing models," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(4), pages 617-642, December.
    19. Nechvátalová, Lenka, 2025. "Autoencoder asset pricing models and economic restrictions — international evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    20. Hoang, Daniel & Wiegratz, Kevin, 2022. "Machine learning methods in finance: Recent applications and prospects," Working Paper Series in Economics 158, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.14323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.