IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.02909.html

When Predictions Become Regressors: A Split-Sample Correction for Biases in Downstream Inference

Author

Listed:
  • Nathan Canen
  • Ted Enamorado

Abstract

Prediction-based methods, including Large Language Models (LLMs) and other machine learning techniques, are often used to construct measures of political phenomena that are difficult to quantify directly, such as policy positions in manifestos or emotions expressed on social media. In many applications, these prediction-generated measures are used as explanatory variables in regression models, even though they are measured with error. This leads to biased estimates. In this paper, we propose a simple solution to these biases: instrumental variables constructed from multiple measures created on independent splits of the original data. This approach is theoretically valid, easy to implement, and does not require new data. Through simulations, we show that this approach recovers estimates close to the true values, even in relatively small samples, while the standard approach can produce substantial bias in practice. We illustrate the method by revisiting two applications: whether gendered speech affects legislative outcomes in the German Parliament, and whether political risk influences poverty alleviation programs in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathan Canen & Ted Enamorado, 2026. "When Predictions Become Regressors: A Split-Sample Correction for Biases in Downstream Inference," Papers 2608.02909, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.02909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.02909
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bosley, Mitchell & Kuzushima, Saki & Enamorado, Ted & Shiraito, Yuki, 2025. "Improving Probabilistic Models In Text Classification Via Active Learning," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 119(2), pages 985-1002, May.
    2. Max H. Farrell & Tengyuan Liang & Sanjog Misra, 2021. "Deep Neural Networks for Estimation and Inference," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(1), pages 181-213, January.
    3. Ashenfelter, Orley & Krueger, Alan B, 1994. "Estimates of the Economic Returns to Schooling from a New Sample of Twins," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(5), pages 1157-1173, December.
    4. Laura Battaglia & Timothy Christensen & Stephen Hansen & Szymon Sacher, 2024. "Inference for Regression with Variables Generated by AI or Machine Learning," Papers 2402.15585, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    5. Matthew Gentzkow & Jesse M. Shapiro & Matt Taddy, 2019. "Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(4), pages 1307-1340, July.
    6. Gordon Burtch & Edward McFowland III & Mochen Yang & Gediminas Adomavicius, 2023. "EnsembleIV: Creating Instrumental Variables from Ensemble Learners for Robust Statistical Inference with ML-Generated Variables," Papers 2303.02820, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    7. Atsushi Inoue & Gary Solon, 2010. "Two-Sample Instrumental Variables Estimators," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 92(3), pages 557-561, August.
    8. Braghieri, Luca & Eichmeyer, Sarah & Levy, Ro'ee & Mobius, Markus & Steinhardt, Jacob & Zhong, Ruiqi, 2024. "Article-level Slant and Polarization of News Consumption on Social Media," CEPR Discussion Papers 19807, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    9. Gloria Gennaro & Elliott Ash, 2022. "Emotion and Reason in Political Language," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(643), pages 1037-1059.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Battaglia & Timothy M. Christensen & Stephen Hansen & Szymon Sacher, 2024. "Inference for regression with variables generated from unstructured data," CeMMAP working papers 10/24, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    2. Battaglia, Laura & Christensen, Tim & Hansen, Stephen & Sacher, Szymon, 2024. "Inference for Regression with Variables Generated by AI or Machine Learning," CEPR Discussion Papers 19115, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    3. Hauzenberger, Niko & Huber, Florian & Klieber, Karin & Marcellino, Massimiliano, 2025. "Bayesian neural networks for macroeconomic analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 249(PC).
    4. Kyle Colangelo & Ying-Ying Lee, 2019. "Double debiased machine learning nonparametric inference with continuous treatments," CeMMAP working papers CWP72/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    5. Cage, Julia & Le Pennec-Caldichoury , Caroline & Mougin, Elisa, 2021. "Corporate Donations and Political Rhetoric: Evidence from a National Ban," CEPR Discussion Papers 16774, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    6. Nicholas Sim, 2015. "Astronomics In Action: The Graduate Earnings Premium And The Dragon Effect In Singapore," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 53(2), pages 922-939, April.
    7. Liran Einav & Ephraim Leibtag & Aviv Nevo, 2010. "Recording discrepancies in Nielsen Homescan data: Are they present and do they matter?," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 207-239, June.
    8. Dinand Webbink & Sunčica Vujić & Pierre Koning & Nicholas G. Martin, 2012. "The Effect Of Childhood Conduct Disorder On Human Capital," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(8), pages 928-945, August.
    9. Calamunci, Francesca Maria & Frattini, Federico Fabio, "undated". "When Crime Tears Communities Apart: Social Capital and Organised Crime," FEEM Working Papers 334350, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    10. David M. Arseneau & Alejandro Drexler & Mitsuhiro Osada, 2022. "Central Bank Communication about Climate Change," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2022-031, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    11. Samuel Bowles & Herbert Gintis & Melissa Osborne, 2000. "The Determinants of Earnings: Skills, Preferences, and Schooling," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2000-07, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    12. repec:osf:socarx:qhs6j_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Konrad Menzel, 2021. "Structural Sieves," Papers 2112.01377, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2022.
    14. De Fraja, Gianni, 2011. "The source of differences in population distributions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 130-132, September.
    15. Raaum,O. & Aabo,T.E., 1999. "The effect of schooling on earnings : the role of family background studied by a large sample of Norwegian twins," Memorandum 16/1999, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    16. Kai Barron & Luis F. Gamboa & Paul Rodríguez-Lesmes, 2019. "Behavioural Response to a Sudden Health Risk: Dengue and Educational Outcomes in Colombia," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 620-644, April.
    17. Hongbin Li & Mark Rosenzweig & Junsen Zhang, 2010. "Altruism, Favoritism, and Guilt in the Allocation of Family Resources: Sophie's Choice in Mao's Mass Send-Down Movement," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 118(1), pages 1-38, February.
    18. Goodman, Joshua & Hurwitz, Michael & Smith, Jonathan & Fox, Julia, 2015. "The relationship between siblings’ college choices: Evidence from one million SAT-taking families," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 75-85.
    19. Jelena Bradic & Weijie Ji & Yuqian Zhang, 2021. "High-dimensional Inference for Dynamic Treatment Effects," Papers 2110.04924, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    20. Myck, Michal & Nici?ska, Anna & Morawski, Leszek, 2009. "Count Your Hours: Returns to Education in Poland," IZA Discussion Papers 4332, IZA Network @ LISER.
    21. Davide Viviano & Jelena Bradic, 2019. "Synthetic learner: model-free inference on treatments over time," Papers 1904.01490, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.02909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.