IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2607.24143.html

Inference on counterfactual distributions using martingale posteriors

Author

Listed:
  • Gregor Steiner
  • Mark Steel

Abstract

Causal inference is often focused on average effects, which can hide important aspects of the effect distributions. Here we consider the entire posterior effects distribution by estimating full counterfactual outcome distributions. We propose a methodology for inference on counterfactual distributions which builds upon the martingale posterior framework of Fong et al. (2023). This provides a highly flexible approach to estimating densities, distribution functions, and derived quantities such as quantiles, which coherently quantifies the epistemic uncertainty on any target estimand of interest. As the predictive recursions are based on an underlying nonparametric model (a Dirichlet process mixture model), our method naturally inherits robustness with respect to restrictive parametric assumptions. In addition, implementation of our method is typically very fast. This approach can be applied to marginal or conditional counterfactual distributions and is easily extended to an instrumental variables setup. Using the concept of almost conditionally identically distributed random variables, we prove convergence of the martingale posterior inference on the counterfactual outcome distributions for the causal models considered in the paper. We illustrate our approach on both simulated and real data. Using the latter, we investigate the effect of zinc lozenges on common cold duration, the impact of vitamin A supplementation on children's survival rates with one-sided non-compliance (analysed in Imbens and Rubin, 1997a) and the effect of job training (LaLonde, 1986).

Suggested Citation

  • Gregor Steiner & Mark Steel, 2026. "Inference on counterfactual distributions using martingale posteriors," Papers 2607.24143, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.24143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.24143
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guido W. Imbens & Yiqing Xu, 2025. "Comparing Experimental and Nonexperimental Methods: What Lessons Have We Learned Four Decades after LaLonde (1986)?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 39(4), pages 173-202, Fall.
    2. Sandra Fortini & Sonia Petrone, 2020. "Quasi‐Bayes properties of a procedure for sequential learning in mixture models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(4), pages 1087-1114, September.
    3. Alberto Caron & Gianluca Baio & Ioanna Manolopoulou, 2022. "Estimating individual treatment effects using non‐parametric regression models: A review," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(3), pages 1115-1149, July.
    4. P. Richard Hahn & Ryan Martin & Stephen G. Walker, 2018. "On Recursive Bayesian Predictive Distributions," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 113(523), pages 1085-1093, July.
    5. Guido Imbens & Yiqing Xu, 2024. "Comparing Experimental and Nonexperimental Methods: What Lessons Have We Learned Four Decades After LaLonde (1986)?," Papers 2406.00827, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    6. Noah Hollmann & Samuel Müller & Lennart Purucker & Arjun Krishnakumar & Max Körfer & Shi Bin Hoo & Robin Tibor Schirrmeister & Frank Hutter, 2025. "Accurate predictions on small data with a tabular foundation model," Nature, Nature, vol. 637(8045), pages 319-326, January.
    7. Victor Chernozhukov & Christian Hansen, 2005. "An IV Model of Quantile Treatment Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(1), pages 245-261, January.
    8. Jason Roy & Kirsten J. Lum & Bret Zeldow & Jordan D. Dworkin & Vincent Lo Re & Michael J. Daniels, 2018. "Bayesian nonparametric generative models for causal inference with missing at random covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 1193-1202, December.
    9. Tymon S{l}oczy'nski, 2020. "When Should We (Not) Interpret Linear IV Estimands as LATE?," Papers 2011.06695, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    10. E H Kennedy & S Balakrishnan & L A Wasserman, 2023. "Semiparametric counterfactual density estimation," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 110(4), pages 875-896.
    11. Donald, Stephen G. & Hsu, Yu-Chin, 2014. "Estimation and inference for distribution functions and quantile functions in treatment effect models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 178(P3), pages 383-397.
    12. Ai, Chunrong & Linton, Oliver & Zhang, Zheng, 2022. "Estimation and inference for the counterfactual distribution and quantile functions in continuous treatment models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 228(1), pages 39-61.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zequn Jin & Lihua Lin & Zhengyu Zhang, 2022. "Identification and Auto-debiased Machine Learning for Outcome Conditioned Average Structural Derivatives," Papers 2211.07903, arXiv.org.
    2. Patrizia Berti & Luca Pratelli & Pietro Rigo, 2021. "A Central Limit Theorem for Predictive Distributions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Rametta, Jack T. & Fuller, Sam, 2026. "Are Random Forests Still ‘Good Enough’? Tabular Prior-Data Fitted Networks for Predictive and Causal Tasks," SocArXiv g29xc_v1, Center for Open Science.
    4. Zongwu Cai & Ying Fang & Ming Lin & Shengfang Tang, 2021. "A Nonparametric Test for Testing Heterogeneity in Conditional Quantile Treatment Effects," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202117, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2021.
    5. Chunrong Ai & Oliver Linton & Kaiji Motegi & Zheng Zhang, 2021. "A unified framework for efficient estimation of general treatment models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(3), pages 779-816, July.
    6. Yu-Chin Hsu & Martin Huber & Yu-Min Yen, 2023. "Doubly Robust Estimation of Direct and Indirect Quantile Treatment Effects with Machine Learning," Papers 2307.01049, arXiv.org.
    7. Georg Keilbar & Sonja Greven, 2026. "Counterfactual Density Effects and the German East--West Income Gap," Papers 2603.28470, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    8. Shengfang Tang & Zongwu Cai & Ying Fang & Ming Lin, 2020. "A New Quantile Treatment Effect Model for Studying Smoking Effect on Birth Weight During Mother's Pregnancy," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202003, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Feb 2020.
    9. Tatsushi Oka & Shota Yasui & Yuta Hayakawa & Undral Byambadalai, 2026. "Regression adjustment for estimating distributional treatment effects in randomized controlled trials," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 2-17, January.
    10. Zongwu Cai & Ying Fang & Ming Lin & Shengfang Tang, 2020. "Inferences for Partially Conditional Quantile Treatment Effect Model," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202005, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Feb 2020.
    11. David Roodman & Maxim Massenkoff, 2026. "An evidence review of worker retraining," Papers 2609.07011, arXiv.org.
    12. Sungwon Lee, 2020. "Identification and Confidence Regions for Treatment Effect and its Distribution under Stochastic Dominance," Working Papers 2011, Nam Duck-Woo Economic Research Institute, Sogang University (Former Research Institute for Market Economy).
    13. Brantly Callaway & Weige Huang, 2020. "Distributional Effects of a Continuous Treatment with an Application on Intergenerational Mobility," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 82(4), pages 808-842, August.
    14. Zongwu Cai & Ying Fang & Ming Lin & Shengfang Tang, 2021. "Estimating Partially Conditional Quantile Treatment Effects," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202103, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Jan 2021.
    15. Ferreira,Francisco H. G. & Firpo,Sergio & Galvao,Antonio F., 2017. "Estimation and inference for actual and counterfactual growth incidence curves," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7933, The World Bank.
    16. Brantly Callaway & Tong Li, 2019. "Quantile treatment effects in difference in differences models with panel data," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(4), pages 1579-1618, November.
    17. Cappello, Lorenzo & Walker, Stephen G., 2026. "Recursive nonparametric predictive for a discrete regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    18. Akosah, Nana Kwame & Alagidede, Imhotep Paul & Schaling, Eric, 2020. "Testing for asymmetry in monetary policy rule for small-open developing economies: Multiscale Bayesian quantile evidence from Ghana," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    19. Antonio F. Galvao & Ulrich Hounyo & Jiahao Lin, 2026. "GMM for Panel Data Quantile Regression," Papers 2610.12824, arXiv.org.
    20. Isaiah Andrews & Anna Mikusheva, 2016. "Conditional Inference With a Functional Nuisance Parameter," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 1571-1612, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.24143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.