IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.31469.html

Same Firms, Different Verdicts: ESG Rating Choice and the Measurement of Greenwashing

Author

Listed:
  • Praveen Kumar Ashok Kumar
  • Rafa{l} Sieradzki

Abstract

This paper investigates the Aggregate Confusion hypothesis (Berg, Kolbel, and Rigobon, 2022) at the firm level by measuring the Disclosure-Performance Gap (DPG), the standardised divergence between a firm's voluntary environmental disclosure ("Talk") and its realised emissions performance ("Walk"). The sample comprises 200 large European firms from the Energy, Materials, Industrials, and Utilities sectors of the STOXX Europe 600 in fiscal year 2023, the final cross-section of the voluntary reporting era before the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. The model is selected through a six-stage process, candidate assembly, correlation screening, VIF based multicollinearity filtering, stepwise forward search under the corrected Akaike Information Criterion, Cook's distance screening, and HC3 re-estimation across 421 candidate specifications, estimated by ordinary least squares with HC3 robust standard errors on the full sample. Flagship index membership is the strongest predictor of a wider gap ($\beta$ = +0.78, p

Suggested Citation

  • Praveen Kumar Ashok Kumar & Rafa{l} Sieradzki, 2026. "Same Firms, Different Verdicts: ESG Rating Choice and the Measurement of Greenwashing," Papers 2606.31469, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.31469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.31469
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra A. Waddock & Samuel B. Graves, 1997. "The Corporate Social Performance–Financial Performance Link," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 303-319, April.
    2. Thomas P. Lyon & John W. Maxwell, 2011. "Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure under Threat of Audit," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 3-41, March.
    3. Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2015. "The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts' perceptions and shifting institutional logics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(7), pages 1053-1081, July.
    4. Clarkson, Peter M. & Li, Yue & Richardson, Gordon D. & Vasvari, Florin P., 2008. "Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(4-5), pages 303-327.
    5. Bingler, Julia Anna & Kraus, Mathias & Leippold, Markus & Webersinke, Nicolas, 2022. "Cheap talk and cherry-picking: What ClimateBert has to say on corporate climate risk disclosures," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PB).
    6. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 2008. "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 48(2), April.
    7. Cho, Charles H. & Patten, Dennis M., 2007. "The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(7-8), pages 639-647.
    8. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    9. Becker, Bo & Milbourn, Todd, 2011. "How did increased competition affect credit ratings?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 493-514, September.
    10. Breusch, T S & Pagan, A R, 1979. "A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 47(5), pages 1287-1294, September.
    11. Jasmin Joecks & Kerstin Pull & Karin Vetter, 2013. "Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?”," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 61-72, November.
    12. Michael Spence, 1973. "Job Market Signaling," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 87(3), pages 355-374.
    13. Crawford, Vincent P & Sobel, Joel, 1982. "Strategic Information Transmission," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(6), pages 1431-1451, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Ratti & Marika Arena & Giovanni Azzone & Laura Dell'Agostino, 2025. "Beyond Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Tangible Efforts or Greenwashing? The Case of Italian Non‐Financial Listed Companies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 7694-7713, October.
    2. Roth, Victoria, 2021. "Talking is Silver, Doing is Gold? – The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Financial Performance," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 6(3), pages 637-672.
    3. Soh Young In & Young Joon Lee & Robert G. Eccles, 2024. "Looking back and looking forward: A scientometric analysis of the evolution of corporate sustainability research over 47 years," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2225-2259, May.
    4. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    5. Qian, Wei & Schaltegger, Stefan, 2017. "Revisiting carbon disclosure and performance: Legitimacy and management views," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 365-379.
    6. Gooßen, Finn Matthes, 2025. "The impact of female board members on ESG performance: An empirical analysis," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 10(4), pages 940-965.
    7. Rudra P. Pradhan & S. M. R. K. Samarakoon & Rana P. Maradana & Premjit Sahoo, 2025. "Climate change disclosure and firm value in a frontier market: Exploring the determinants," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(2), pages 1931-1964, May.
    8. Jannik Gerwanski, 2020. "Does it pay off? Integrated reporting and cost of debt: European evidence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2299-2319, September.
    9. Syeda Khiraza Naqvi & Faisal Shahzad & Ijaz Ur Rehman & Fiza Qureshi & Usama Laique, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility performance and information asymmetry: The moderating role of analyst coverage," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1549-1563, November.
    10. Varsha Sehgal & Naval Garg & Jagvinder Singh, 2023. "Impact of sustainability performance & reporting on a firm’s reputation," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 228-240, February.
    11. Patrick J. Ferguson & Jane Hronsky & Matt Pinnuck, 2023. "Who pays attention to sustainability reports and why? Evidence from Google search activity," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3519-3551, September.
    12. Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Schiemann, Frank & Schneider, Fabiola I. & Tietmeyer, Raphael, 2025. "ESG disclosure as advertisement of corporate bond issuances," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    13. Mohammed Benlemlih & Amama Shaukat & Yan Qiu & Grzegorz Trojanowski, 2018. "Environmental and Social Disclosures and Firm Risk," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 613-626, October.
    14. Varsha Sehgal & Naval Garg & Jagvinder Singh, 2022. "Impact of Environmental and Social Reporting and Performance on Financial Performance of a Firm: An Indian Study," Paradigm, , vol. 26(2), pages 99-118, December.
    15. Xiaohua Meng & Saixing Zeng & Xuemei Xie & Hailiang Zou, 2019. "Beyond symbolic and substantive: Strategic disclosure of corporate environmental information in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 403-417, February.
    16. Stefano Fontana & Daniela Coluccia & Silvia Solimene, 2019. "VAIC as a Tool for Measuring Intangibles Value in Voluntary Multi-Stakeholder Disclosure," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(4), pages 1679-1699, December.
    17. Varsha Sehgal & Naval Garg & Jagvinder Singh, 2023. "Impact of sustainability reporting and performance on organization legitimacy," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 143-153, March.
    18. Liu, Fengyun & Yu, Jiaru & Shen, Yifan & He, Lingyun, 2022. "Does the resource-dependent motivation to disclose environmental information impact company financing? Evidence from renewable energy companies of China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 156-166.
    19. Hilton, Joshua, 2025. "An integrated analysis of greenhush," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(2).
    20. Carlos Estevez‐Mendoza & Juan Infante, 2025. "Evolution and relevance of research on Environmental, Social, and Governance factors," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 1545-1566, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.31469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.