IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.29793.html

Fund2Persona: A Framework for Building and Refining Financial Advisor Personas from Fund Disclosure Data

Author

Listed:
  • Suhwan Park
  • Hoyoung Lee
  • Zhangyang Wang
  • Alejandro Lopez-Lira
  • Young Cha
  • Chanyeol Choi
  • Jaewon Choi
  • Yongjae Lee

Abstract

Demand for personalized financial advising is growing, but consistent advisor expertise is difficult to obtain, scale, and encode in LLM systems. Simple persona prompts rarely specify how a financial advisor should reason and often drift toward generic recommendations. We propose Fund2Persona, a framework that grounds financial-advisor personas in fund disclosures, holdings transitions, market context, and manager commentary, then refines them through an agentic actor--scorer--patcher loop. We evaluate the resulting personas on held-out holdings-transition reconstruction and manager-commentary alignment, where they better recover portfolio decisions and grounded manager interpretation than generic baselines. We further study two downstream diagnostics: market-scenario generation, where persona retrieval broadens plausible investment views beyond repeated generic rollouts, and advisory dialogues grounded in investor profiles, where matched personas give more specific and useful advice than a generic advisor. These results suggest that fund-data-grounded financial-advisor personas can make manager-specific investment expertise portable rather than merely changing an LLM's surface style.

Suggested Citation

  • Suhwan Park & Hoyoung Lee & Zhangyang Wang & Alejandro Lopez-Lira & Young Cha & Chanyeol Choi & Jaewon Choi & Yongjae Lee, 2026. "Fund2Persona: A Framework for Building and Refining Financial Advisor Personas from Fund Disclosure Data," Papers 2606.29793, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.29793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.29793
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoyoung Lee & Junhyuk Seo & Suhwan Park & Junhyeong Lee & Wonbin Ahn & Chanyeol Choi & Alejandro Lopez-Lira & Yongjae Lee, 2025. "Your AI, Not Your View: The Bias of LLMs in Investment Analysis," Papers 2507.20957, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    2. Takehiro Takayanagi & Kiyoshi Izumi & Javier Sanz-Cruzado & Richard McCreadie & Iadh Ounis, 2025. "Are Generative AI Agents Effective Personalized Financial Advisors?," Papers 2504.05862, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    3. Kunihiro Miyazaki & Takanobu Kawahara & Stephen Roberts & Stefan Zohren, 2026. "Toward Expert Investment Teams:A Multi-Agent LLM System with Fine-Grained Trading Tasks," Papers 2602.23330, arXiv.org.
    4. Argyle, Lisa P. & Busby, Ethan C. & Fulda, Nancy & Gubler, Joshua R. & Rytting, Christopher & Wingate, David, 2023. "Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(3), pages 337-351, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anne Lundgaard Hansen & Seung Jung Lee, 2025. "Financial Stability Implications of Generative AI: Taming the Animal Spirits," Papers 2510.01451, arXiv.org.
    2. Seung Jung Lee & Anne Lundgaard Hansen, 2025. "Financial Stability Implications of Generative AI: Taming the Animal Spirits," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2025-090, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    3. Yaxuan Kong & Hoyoung Lee & Yoontae Hwang & Alejandro Lopez-Lira & Bradford Levy & Dhagash Mehta & Qingsong Wen & Chanyeol Choi & Yongjae Lee & Stefan Zohren, 2026. "Evaluating LLMs in Finance Requires Explicit Bias Consideration," Papers 2602.14233, arXiv.org.
    4. Eric Hitz & Mingmin Feng & Radu Tanase & Ren'e Algesheimer & Manuel S. Mariani, 2025. "The amplifier effect of artificial agents in social contagion," Papers 2502.21037, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    5. Kim, Soojong & Kim, Kwanho & Kim, Hye Min, 2025. "Large language models’ varying accuracy in recognizing risk-promoting and health-supporting sentiments in public health discourse: The cases of HPV vaccination and heated tobacco products," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
    6. Sean Cao & Wei Jiang & Hui Xu, 2026. "Seeing the Goal, Missing the Truth: Human Accountability for AI Bias," Papers 2602.09504, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    7. Felipe A. Csaszar & Harsh Ketkar & Hyunjin Kim, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Strategic Decision-Making: Evidence from Entrepreneurs and Investors," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 322-345, December.
    8. Shenkman, E. & Parshakov, P. & Matkin , N., 2026. "Comparative analysis of large language models and human behavior in the Dictator Game," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 71(2), pages 177-203.
    9. John R. Graham & Campbell R. Harvey & Manish Jha, 2026. "CFOs Meet LLMs," Papers 2606.13812, arXiv.org.
    10. Andrew Katz & Gabriella Coloyan Fleming & Joyce B. Main, 2026. "Thematic analysis with open-source generative AI and machine learning: a new method for inductive qualitative codebook development," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Hongshen Sun & Juanjuan Zhang, 2025. "From Model Choice to Model Belief: Establishing a New Measure for LLM-Based Research," Papers 2512.23184, arXiv.org.
    12. Koji Takahashi & Joon Suk Park, 2025. "Generative AI for Surveys on Payment Apps: AIs' View on Privacy and Technology," IMES Discussion Paper Series 25-E-13, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan.
    13. Hui Chen & Antoine Didisheim & Mohammad & Pourmohammadi & Luciano Somoza & Hanqing Tian, 2025. "A Financial Brain Scan of the LLM," Papers 2508.21285, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    14. repec:osf:socarx:8je9g_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. repec:osf:osfxxx:r3qng_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Giulia Iadisernia & Carolina Camassa, 2025. "Prompting for Policy: Forecasting Macroeconomic Scenarios with Synthetic LLM Personas," Papers 2511.02458, arXiv.org.
    17. Chon, Sora & Kim, Jaehoon & Kim, Jaeho, 2025. "Multifaceted variability in LLM-driven stock recommendations," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PG).
    18. Matthew O. Jackson & Qiaozhu Me & Stephanie W. Wang & Yutong Xie & Walter Yuan & Seth Benzell & Erik Brynjolfsson & Colin F. Camerer & James Evans & Brian Jabarian & Jon Kleinberg & Juanjuan Meng & Se, 2025. "AI Behavioral Science," Papers 2509.13323, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    19. Shilei Luo & Zhiqi Zhang & Hengchen Dai & Dennis Zhang, 2026. "Behavioral Transfer in AI Agents: Evidence and Privacy Implications," Papers 2604.19925, arXiv.org.
    20. Mengxin Wang & Dennis J. Zhang & Heng Zhang, 2026. "Large Language Models for Market Research: A Data-Augmentation Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 728-751, July.
    21. George Gui & Seungwoo Kim, 2025. "Leveraging LLMs to Improve Experimental Design: A Generative Stratification Approach," Papers 2509.25709, arXiv.org.
    22. Jeon, June & Kim, Lanu & Park, Jaehyuk, 2025. "The ethics of generative AI in social science research: A qualitative approach for institutionally grounded AI research ethics," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.29793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.