IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.25997.html

Variable Bound Tightening for Nash Equilibrium Computation in Multiplayer Imperfect-Information Games

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Ganzfried

Abstract

There has been significant recent progress in algorithms for approximation of Nash equilibrium in large two-player zero-sum imperfect-information games and exact computation of Nash equilibrium in multiplayer strategic-form games. While counterfactual regret minimization and fictitious play are scalable to large games and have convergence guarantees in two-player zero-sum games, they do not guarantee convergence to Nash equilibrium in multiplayer games. Recently, an approach has been presented for exact computation of Nash equilibrium in multiplayer imperfect-information games that solves a quadratically constrained program based on a nonlinear complementarity problem formulation derived from the sequence-form game representation. This formulation was solved using Gurobi's nonconvex quadratic solver, which employs spatial branch-and-bound to iteratively refine variable bounds by solving convex relaxations of bilinear terms via McCormick envelopes. During presolve, Gurobi introduces auxiliary variables and, in some cases, binary variables, leading to an internal MIQCP reformulation. This approach was demonstrated to outperform prior algorithms from the Gambit software suite and quickly solve three-player Kuhn poker after removal of dominated actions; however, the algorithm was not able to solve the full version of the game within 24 hours. In this paper, we derive finite bounds on slack and multiplier variables in the nonlinear complementarity formulation. These bounds strengthen the convex relaxations used within spatial branch-and-bound and lead to substantial computational improvements. We demonstrate the impact of the proposed bounds on exact Nash equilibrium computation in three-player Kuhn poker.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Ganzfried, 2026. "Variable Bound Tightening for Nash Equilibrium Computation in Multiplayer Imperfect-Information Games," Papers 2606.25997, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.25997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.25997
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sam Ganzfried, 2026. "Quadratic Programming Approach for Nash Equilibrium Computation in Multiplayer Imperfect-Information Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Theodore Turocy, 2010. "Computing sequential equilibria using agent quantal response equilibria," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 42(1), pages 255-269, January.
    3. C. E. Lemke, 1965. "Bimatrix Equilibrium Points and Mathematical Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(7), pages 681-689, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernhard Stengel, 2010. "Computation of Nash equilibria in finite games: introduction to the symposium," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 42(1), pages 1-7, January.
    2. Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury & Jugal Garg & Peter McGlaughlin & Ruta Mehta, 2023. "A Complementary Pivot Algorithm for Competitive Allocation of a Mixed Manna," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 1630-1656, August.
    3. Zhang, Bin, 2012. "Multi-tier binary solution method for multi-product newsvendor problem with multiple constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 426-434.
    4. Baohua Huang & Wen Li, 2023. "A smoothing Newton method based on the modulus equation for a class of weakly nonlinear complementarity problems," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 345-381, September.
    5. Christian Bidard, 2012. "The Frail Grounds of the Ricardian Dynamics," Working Papers hal-04141039, HAL.
    6. Heggedal, Tom-Reiel & Helland, Leif & Neset Joslin, Knut-Eric, 2018. "Should I Stay or should I Go? Bandwagons in the lab," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 86-97.
    7. R. B. Bapat & S. K. Neogy, 2016. "On a quadratic programming problem involving distances in trees," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 243(1), pages 365-373, August.
    8. Richard Asmuth, 1978. "Studying Economic Equilibria on Affine Networks Via Lemke's Algorithm," Discussion Papers 314, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    9. Porter, Ryan & Nudelman, Eugene & Shoham, Yoav, 2008. "Simple search methods for finding a Nash equilibrium," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 642-662, July.
    10. Benjamin F. Hobbs & J. S. Pang, 2007. "Nash-Cournot Equilibria in Electric Power Markets with Piecewise Linear Demand Functions and Joint Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 113-127, February.
    11. Rahul Savani & Bernhard von Stengel, 2016. "Unit vector games," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 12(1), pages 7-27, March.
    12. Yiyin Cao & Chuangyin Dang, 2025. "A Characterization of Reny's Weakly Sequentially Rational Equilibrium through $\varepsilon$-Perfect $\gamma$-Weakly Sequentially Rational Equilibrium," Papers 2505.19496, arXiv.org.
    13. Zhe Liu & Yahya Fathi, 2012. "The nearest point problem in a polyhedral set and its extensions," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 115-130, September.
    14. V. Venkateswaran, 1991. "A descent approach to solving the complementary programming problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 679-698, October.
    15. Murray, Timothy & Garg, Jugal & Nagi, Rakesh, 2021. "Limited-trust equilibria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 364-380.
    16. Peter Godfrey-Smith & Manolo Martínez, 2013. "Communication and Common Interest," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-6, November.
    17. S. R. Mohan, 1997. "Degeneracy Subgraph of the Lemke Complementary Pivot Algorithm and Anticycling Rule," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 94(2), pages 409-423, August.
    18. Bland, James R. & Turocy, Theodore L., 2026. "Quantal response equilibrium as a structural model for estimation: The missing manual," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 592-618.
    19. Yves Breitmoser, 2012. "Proto-coalition bargaining and the core," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 51(3), pages 581-599, November.
    20. Christian Bidard, 2014. "The Ricardian rent theory: an overview," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP8, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione 'Piero Sraffa'.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.25997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.