IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.25484.html

From Causal Discovery to Implementation: An Agentic AI Framework for E-Scooter Mobility Hub Planning Across 29 German Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Meng Jin
  • Melanie Handrich
  • Simone Martinenz
  • Nicholas Hoeser
  • Ziyue Li

Abstract

Existing approaches to e-scooter mobility hub planning lack city-type-specific causal evidence. Demand models are typically correlational, built on proprietary trip data, and do not distinguish how driver profiles vary across urban typologies. This paper presents a three-phase agentic AI framework that constructs a Causal Template Library from public GBFS data across 29 German cities, encoding which environmental features causally drive hotspot demand for each combination of city type (large, university, industrial, hilly) and cluster type (core, peripheral). A large language model (LLM) orchestrated causal discovery pipeline adapts algorithm selection to local data conditions across 57 city-cluster units. The library reveals systematic variation. Core demand is driven by activity access and transit proximity, while peripheral demand responds to built form, with city-type-specific patterns supporting transferable siting templates. A planning tool built on the library scores candidate sites, calibrates infrastructure recommendations to local demographics, and generates practitioner-ready reports. In Heilbronn, Germany, two hub sites informed by the framework's causal evidence are currently under construction, illustrating how the outputs can support real-world siting decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng Jin & Melanie Handrich & Simone Martinenz & Nicholas Hoeser & Ziyue Li, 2026. "From Causal Discovery to Implementation: An Agentic AI Framework for E-Scooter Mobility Hub Planning Across 29 German Cities," Papers 2606.25484, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.25484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.25484
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berg Wincent, Boel & Jenelius, Erik & Burghout, Wilco, 2025. "Shared e-scooter parking regulation: Effects on rider attitudes, perceptions, and use," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. McKenzie, Grant, 2019. "Spatiotemporal comparative analysis of scooter-share and bike-share usage patterns in Washington, D.C," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 19-28.
    3. Hui Zou & Trevor Hastie, 2005. "Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(2), pages 301-320, April.
    4. Huo, Jinghai & Yang, Hongtai & Li, Chaojing & Zheng, Rong & Yang, Linchuan & Wen, Yi, 2021. "Influence of the built environment on E-scooter sharing ridership: A tale of five cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehzabin Tuli, Farzana & Mitra, Suman & Crews, Mariah B., 2021. "Factors influencing the usage of shared E-scooters in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 164-185.
    2. Shah, Nitesh R. & Ziedan, Abubakr & Brakewood, Candace & Cherry, Christopher R., 2023. "Shared e-scooter service providers with large fleet size have a competitive advantage: Findings from e-scooter demand and supply analysis of Nashville, Tennessee," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Jin, Scarlett T. & Sui, Daniel Z., 2024. "A comparative analysis of the spatial determinants of e-bike and e-scooter sharing link flows," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Krauss, Konstantin & Gnann, Till & Burgert, Tobias & Axhausen, Kay W., 2024. "Faster, greener, scooter? An assessment of shared e-scooter usage based on real-world driving data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Kim, Minju & Puczkowskyj, Nicholas & MacArthur, John & Dill, Jennifer, 2023. "Perspectives on e-scooters use: A multi-year cross-sectional approach to understanding e-scooter travel behavior in Portland, Oregon," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    6. Foissaud, Nicolas & Gioldasis, Christos & Tamura, Shun & Christoforou, Zoi & Farhi, Nadir, 2022. "Free-floating e-scooter usage in urban areas: A spatiotemporal analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    7. Juan José Vinagre Díaz & Rubén Fernández Pozo & Ana Belén Rodríguez González & Mark Richard Wilby & Bani Anvari, 2024. "Blind classification of e-scooter trips according to their relationship with public transport," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1679-1700, October.
    8. Liu, Hung-Chi & Lin, Jen-Jia, 2022. "Associations of built environments with spatiotemporal patterns of shared scooter use: A comparison with shared bike use," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 107-119.
    9. Chen, Shuting & Cao, Zhejing & Zhang, Xiaohu, 2025. "Adaptive scootability index: Built environment, travel purpose and e-scooter preferred route," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    10. Yang, Hongtai & Huo, Jinghai & Bao, Yongxing & Li, Xuan & Yang, Linchuan & Cherry, Christopher R., 2021. "Impact of e-scooter sharing on bike sharing in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 23-36.
    11. Priyanka Verma & Grant McKenzie, 2024. "Regional comparison of socio-demographic variation in urban E-scooter usage," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(7), pages 1548-1562, September.
    12. Gao, Kun & Yang, Ying & Gil, Jorge & Qu, Xiaobo, 2023. "Data-driven interpretation on interactive and nonlinear effects of the correlated built environment on shared mobility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. Gkartzonikas, Christos & Dimitriou, Loukas, 2026. "Assessment of travel behavior dynamics among young demographic for different trip purposes of shared micro-mobility services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    14. Jin, Scarlett T. & Wang, Lei & Sui, Daniel, 2023. "How the built environment affects E-scooter sharing link flows: A machine learning approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Tyndall, Justin, 2022. "Complementarity of dockless mircomobility and rail transit," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    16. Maximilian Heumann & Tobias Kraschewski & Tim Brauner & Lukas Tilch & Michael H. Breitner, 2021. "A Spatiotemporal Study and Location-Specific Trip Pattern Categorization of Shared E-Scooter Usage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    17. Zoi Christoforou & Christos Gioldasis & Yeltsin Valero & Grigoris Vasileiou-Voudouris, 2022. "Smart Traffic Data for the Analysis of Sustainable Travel Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    18. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    19. Hauzenberger, Niko & Huber, Florian & Klieber, Karin & Marcellino, Massimiliano, 2025. "Bayesian neural networks for macroeconomic analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 249(PC).
    20. Oxana Babecka Kucharcukova & Jan Bruha, 2016. "Nowcasting the Czech Trade Balance," Working Papers 2016/11, Czech National Bank, Research and Statistics Department.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.25484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.