IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.25283.html

Competitive satellite placement and the economic geography of the geostationary orbit

Author

Listed:
  • Akhil Rao
  • Nikodem Szumilo

Abstract

The geostationary orbit (GEO) carries most of the world's satellite communications revenue. The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) coordinates and records frequency assignments and associated orbital positions through national administrations, without creating a market price or property title for longitude. We ask how commercial operators locate along GEO within this administrative regime. Using a spatial sorting model, we show that commercial satellites are placed in proportion to the reachable income below a GEO longitude, discounted by viewing angle at a spatial discount rate. We estimate a placement elasticity close to one, so that satellite counts above a longitude rise proportionately with reachable income. Government satellites, by contrast, are placed in proportion to the population a GEO longitude covers. We validate the commercial model by showing that parameters estimated on 2012 placements predict the 2021 distribution well and that the model rejects treating Chinese GDP as fully addressable to the international commercial fleet. Counterfactuals suggest that competition from low-Earth orbit (LEO) systems may tilt GEO usage toward Asia-Pacific, while higher spatial discounting may concentrate it over high-GDP countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Akhil Rao & Nikodem Szumilo, 2026. "Competitive satellite placement and the economic geography of the geostationary orbit," Papers 2606.25283, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.25283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.25283
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.25283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.