IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.24181.html

Visible or Covert? The Causal Effect of Inspector Visibility on Fare Evasion Detection: A Causal Machine Learning and Policy Learning Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hannes Wallimann
  • C'edric Brutsch
  • Martin Huber

Abstract

Fare evasion generates substantial revenue losses for public transport operators and is typically combated through fare inspections, yet little is known about how the mode of inspection-uniformed versus plainclothes-affects detection efficiency. Using a unique dataset of 21,727 inspection records from PostAuto, the largest regional bus operator in Switzerland, we apply causal machine learning to estimate the causal effect of inspector visibility on inspection efficiency, defined as detected fare evaders per inspection hour. Our results indicate that plainclothes inspections are, on average, significantly more effective than uniformed inspections, with an estimated average treatment effect of -0.173 incidents per hour, corresponding to a relative reduction of approximately 26%. Heterogeneity analyses find no evidence of systematic effect variation across contextual characteristics, suggesting that the superiority of plainclothes inspections is robust and pervasive across the PostAuto network. When applying optimal policy learning (based on policy trees) to optimally target subgroups by one or the other treatment depending on relative effectiveness, plainclothes inspections are recommended for the large majority of contexts (83.3%), with uniformed inspections suggested only for lines characterised by a below-median share of foreign residents and above-median population size.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannes Wallimann & C'edric Brutsch & Martin Huber, 2026. "Visible or Covert? The Causal Effect of Inspector Visibility on Fare Evasion Detection: A Causal Machine Learning and Policy Learning Approach," Papers 2606.24181, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.24181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.24181
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.24181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.