IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.22163.html

Studying Ethnic Endogamy in Croatia with a Suitable Indicator of Homophily

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Naszodi

Abstract

In this paper, we study the patterns of ethnic endogamy in Croatia in relation to six ethnic groups between 1970 and 2015. We find that, over the 45-year period analyzed, the segmentation of the Croatian marriage market was weaker between Czechs and non-Czechs, Hungarians and non-Hungarians, Italians and non-Italians, and Slovaks and non-Slovaks than between Serbs and non-Serbs or Croats and non-Croats. This finding is substantiated by survey evidence revealing similar patterns on relative social distances between different ethnic groups in Croatia and Serbia. From a methodological perspective, we show that a plausible ranking of the degree of segmentation of the Croatian marriage market along ethnic lines can be obtained only when marital sorting is characterized by a carefully selected indicator. While a recently reinvented indicator captures sensible patterns of ethnic endogamy, the commonly applied odds-ratio fails to produce results consistent with survey evidence. AI generated video summary of the paper: https://idil.li/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/A_Tale_of_Two_Numbers2.mp4

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Naszodi, 2026. "Studying Ethnic Endogamy in Croatia with a Suitable Indicator of Homophily," Papers 2606.22163, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.22163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.22163
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.22163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.