IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.17397.html

Designing Recommendation Exposure and Favorite Lists: A Field Experiment in a Spot-Work Platform

Author

Listed:
  • Kazuki Sekiya
  • Suguru Otani
  • Yuki Komatsu
  • Shunsuke Ozeki
  • Shunya Noda

Abstract

How should recommender systems be designed when recommendations shape access to scarce, short-lived opportunities? We study this question in a production setting: Timee, Japan's largest platform for spot work, where workers favorite job templates and receive notifications when firms post shifts from those templates. Maximizing predicted favoriting can generate misdirected concentration: recommendations accumulate on popular templates that create few viable job openings, while templates with unmet labor demand receive too little exposure. We design exposure-control mechanisms for favorite-list management, reallocating template exposure based on posting activity and unfilled capacity. The proposed recommender, thresholded eligibility control (TEC), is fully parallelizable and suitable for large-scale digital platforms. In simulations calibrated to Timee data, TEC raises the per-round job-finding rate from 57.6\% to 70.0\%. A prefecture-level randomized field experiment increases realized matches and exposure per active template, reduces the share of low-exposure templates, and improves impression-level favoriting and downstream matching.

Suggested Citation

  • Kazuki Sekiya & Suguru Otani & Yuki Komatsu & Shunsuke Ozeki & Shunya Noda, 2026. "Designing Recommendation Exposure and Favorite Lists: A Field Experiment in a Spot-Work Platform," Papers 2606.17397, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.17397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.17397
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.17397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.