IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.11859.html

Scenario Generation for Time Series and Curves: A Comparison of Nonparametric and Semiparametric Bootstrap

Author

Listed:
  • Nicola Baldoni
  • Michele Sparviero
  • Lorenzo Viola

Abstract

Generating stochastic trajectories for asset classes is an increasingly relevant task in quantitative finance. Traditional approaches, such as the stationary bootstrap, preserve by construction the empirical distribution of asset-class returns, but do not ensure that each individual simulated path is economically realistic: scenarios may be valid in distribution while single trajectories fail to represent plausible states of the world. To address this limitation, we review semiparametric simulation methodologies that combine a parametric structure, which enforces realistic dynamics, with the resampling of model residuals, which preserves the stochastic component observed in historical data. The issue is particularly acute for interest rates, where direct resampling of rate changes may produce implausible yield-curve evolutions despite correct distributional properties. Our empirical analysis shows the effectiveness of semiparametric bootstrap methods based on autoregressive or mean-reverting specifications. In the fixed-income setting, combining these methods with fully parametric term-structure models yields more coherent and realistic simulations of yield-curve dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola Baldoni & Michele Sparviero & Lorenzo Viola, 2026. "Scenario Generation for Time Series and Curves: A Comparison of Nonparametric and Semiparametric Bootstrap," Papers 2606.11859, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.11859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.11859
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.11859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.