IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2605.29309.html

Implied ETF Carry Rates and the Limits of Arbitrage in Segmented Bitcoin Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Mindy L. Mallory

Abstract

This paper estimates the carry embedded in listed IBIT options and compares it with the carry embedded in matched CME bitcoin futures. Put-call parity recovers an implied forward on the ETF; BlackRock's daily holdings file maps each ETF share into bitcoin units; and CME futures prices and BRRNY, a U.S. close bitcoin reference rate, provide the corresponding futures-market carry. The difference in carry implied by these two products is consistent with frictions that limit cross-margining between spot bitcoin or ETF exposure and CME futures. In the selected-strike IBIT sample of 386 date-bucket observations, the mean wedge is 2.58 percent and the median wedge is 2.52 percent, both measured in annual percentage points. The result is consistent with segmented collateral and margin systems limiting arbitrage between regulated bitcoin-exposure venues.

Suggested Citation

  • Mindy L. Mallory, 2026. "Implied ETF Carry Rates and the Limits of Arbitrage in Segmented Bitcoin Markets," Papers 2605.29309, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.29309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.29309
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.29309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.