IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2605.18049.html

Asymptotic Behaviour of Unexpected Losses and Risk Ratios for Co-Monotonic Alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Max Nendel

Abstract

The aggregation of individual risks in large credit and insurance portfolios is guided by diversification and the law of large numbers, which formalizes the convergence of sample averages to their means. At the same time, regulatory capital requirements and insurance premia are designed to provide a capital buffer or risk margin above the mean. The resulting excess, given by the difference between the nonlinear valuation of the aggregate loss and the corresponding mean, reflects the idea of protection against unexpected losses in the sense of banking and insurance regulation. This paper studies the asymptotic behaviour of this excess for large weighted portfolios. The main result shows that, for monotone cash-additive risk measures on Banach-lattice-valued Orlicz spaces, convergence along weighted averages satisfying a weak law of large numbers together with a uniform integrability condition is equivalent to scalar continuity at the origin. If the risk measure is positively homogeneous, this continuity condition is automatically satisfied, and we prove that the unexpected losses of large weighted portfolios are of order $o(n\overline\lambda_n)$, where $\overline\lambda_n$ denotes the average weight assigned to the first $n$ random variables. We establish analogous asymptotic results for Choquet insurance premia. Finally, we derive risk-ratio limits that quantify the potential underestimation arising when diversified portfolios are compared with co-monotonic alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Max Nendel, 2026. "Asymptotic Behaviour of Unexpected Losses and Risk Ratios for Co-Monotonic Alternatives," Papers 2605.18049, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.18049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.18049
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dhaene, J. & Denuit, M. & Goovaerts, M. J. & Kaas, R. & Vyncke, D., 2002. "The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 133-161, October.
    2. Yaari, Menahem E, 1987. "The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 95-115, January.
    3. Patrick Cheridito & Tianhui Li, 2009. "Risk Measures On Orlicz Hearts," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(2), pages 189-214, April.
    4. Corrado De Vecchi & Max Nendel & Jan Streicher, 2026. "Upper Comonotonicity and Risk Aggregation Under Dependence Uncertainty," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 118-139, January.
    5. Fangda Liu & Ruodu Wang, 2021. "A Theory for Measures of Tail Risk," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 1109-1128, August.
    6. Dhaene, J. & Denuit, M. & Goovaerts, M. J. & Kaas, R. & Vyncke, D., 2002. "The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 3-33, August.
    7. Wang, Shaun S. & Young, Virginia R. & Panjer, Harry H., 1997. "Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 173-183, November.
    8. Carole Bernard & Corrado De Vecchi & Steven Vanduffel, 2023. "The impact of correlation on (Range) Value-at-Risk," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2023(6), pages 531-564, July.
    9. Mario Ghossoub & Jesse Hall & David Saunders, 2023. "Maximum Spectral Measures of Risk with Given Risk Factor Marginal Distributions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 1158-1182, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Vecchi, Corrado & Nendel, Max & Streicher, Jan, 2025. "Upper Comonotonicity and Risk Aggregation under Dependence Uncertainty," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 739, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    2. Lauzier, Jean-Gabriel & Lin, Liyuan & Wang, Ruodu, 2023. "Pairwise counter-monotonicity," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 279-287.
    3. Yang, Jingping & Cheng, Shihong & Zhang, Lihong, 2006. "Bivariate copula decomposition in terms of comonotonicity, countermonotonicity and independence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 267-284, October.
    4. Shuo Gong & Yijun Hu & Linxiao Wei, 2022. "On conditional distortion risk measures under uncertainty," Papers 2211.00520, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    5. Andreas Tsanakas & Evangelia Desli, 2005. "Measurement and Pricing of Risk in Insurance Markets," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1653-1668, December.
    6. Jean-Gabriel Lauzier & Liyuan Lin & Ruodu Wang, 2023. "Pairwise counter-monotonicity," Papers 2302.11701, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    7. Peng Liu & Yang Liu & Houhan Teng, 2025. "Extended Convolution Bounds on the Fr\'{e}chet Problem: Robust Risk Aggregation and Risk Sharing," Papers 2511.21929, arXiv.org.
    8. Wu, Xianyi & Zhou, Xian, 2006. "A new characterization of distortion premiums via countable additivity for comonotonic risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 324-334, April.
    9. Embrechts Paul & Wang Ruodu, 2015. "Seven Proofs for the Subadditivity of Expected Shortfall," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Mierzejewski, Fernando, 2008. "The Allocation of Economic Capital in Opaque Financial Conglomerates," MPRA Paper 9432, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Dominique Guegan & Bertrand K Hassani, 2014. "Distortion Risk Measures or the Transformation of Unimodal Distributions into Multimodal Functions," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14008, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    12. Laeven, Roger J. A. & Goovaerts, Marc J., 2004. "An optimization approach to the dynamic allocation of economic capital," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 299-319, October.
    13. Furman, Edward & Wang, Ruodu & Zitikis, Ričardas, 2017. "Gini-type measures of risk and variability: Gini shortfall, capital allocations, and heavy-tailed risks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 70-84.
    14. Jinghui Chen & Edward Furman & Stephano Ricci & Judeto Shanthirajah, 2025. "Mean-tail Gini framework for optimal portfolio selection," Papers 2509.17225, arXiv.org.
    15. Christopher Blier-Wong & Jean-Gabriel Lauzier, 2026. "Comonotonic improvement under feasibility constraints," Papers 2604.24546, arXiv.org.
    16. Ruodu Wang & Ričardas Zitikis, 2021. "An Axiomatic Foundation for the Expected Shortfall," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1413-1429, March.
    17. J. Marin-Solano (Universitat de Barcelona) & O. Roch (Universitat de Barcelona) & J. Dhaene (Katholieke Univerisiteit Leuven) & C. Ribas (Universitat de Barcelona) & M. Bosch-Princep (Universitat de B, 2009. "Buy-and-Hold Strategies and Comonotonic Approximations," Working Papers in Economics 213, Universitat de Barcelona. Espai de Recerca en Economia.
    18. Alex Stomper & Marie‐Louise Vierø, 2022. "Iterated expectations under rank‐dependent expected utility and implications for common valuation methods," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 55(2), pages 739-763, May.
    19. Jiang, Wenjun & Hong, Hanping & Ren, Jiandong, 2021. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance policies with maximal synergy," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 185-198.
    20. Cheung, Ka Chun, 2009. "Applications of conditional comonotonicity to some optimization problems," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 89-93, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.18049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.