IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2605.16808.html

Dissipation of Debt Financing Privilege on Corporate AI Washing: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Congluo Xu
  • Jiuyue Liu
  • Xiangsheng Zheng
  • Ziyang Li

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence motivates firms to engage in AI washing. This study examines whether strategic policy shocks increase debt financing costs for such firms. Leveraging China's 14th Five Year Plan as a quasi natural experiment, we identify AI washing through the residual between AI narrative intensity and patent output. External validation confirms this decoupling reflects strategic deception evidenced by subsidy extraction and future regulatory violations rather than benign ambition, supporting its validity as an AI washing proxy. Difference in differences estimations reveal that AI washing firms experience a 12.5 basis point relative increase in debt financing cost afterward. Joint estimation confirms simultaneous adjustments across financing and innovation margins. Management shareholding and analyst attention amplify the penalty while supply chain concentration and bank proximity attenuate it. Results remain robust across checks. Our findings illuminate how macro level policy shocks activate market discipline in emerging market debt markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Congluo Xu & Jiuyue Liu & Xiangsheng Zheng & Ziyang Li, 2026. "Dissipation of Debt Financing Privilege on Corporate AI Washing: Evidence from China," Papers 2605.16808, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.16808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.16808
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.16808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.