IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2605.16334.html

How War Distorts International Trade: Gravity-Model Evidence from Europe after the Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Author

Listed:
  • Luigi Capoani
  • Margarita Shnaider
  • Piergiorgio Martini

Abstract

This paper investigates how geopolitical conflict reshapes trade patterns, focusing on the economic consequences of the Russo-Ukrainian war on European and global trade flows. War is conceptualized as a shock that increases bilateral trade costs within a structural gravity model, rather than as a force acting against trade flows, amplifying frictions in territories closer to the epicenter and reducing the economic attractiveness of major trade routes. The empirical analysis combines an Extended Gravity Model based on bilateral trade data from 2019 and 2023 with geographic, institutional, and political factors, including sanctions regimes and energy specialization. The findings show that war not only reduces trade volumes but also operates multiplicatively on trade frictions, influencing both the intensity and direction of trade disruptions, with more pronounced effects in the central corridors of the European market. As a result, some trade relationships collapse while others are redirected towards less exposed regions; furthermore, policy choices are decisive in shaping trade flows and contribute to isolating the Russian economy by creating a policy-induced trade void around the target country, while mechanisms such as the EU Single Market facilitate the internal reallocation of trade flows, preserving economic cohesion.

Suggested Citation

  • Luigi Capoani & Margarita Shnaider & Piergiorgio Martini, 2026. "How War Distorts International Trade: Gravity-Model Evidence from Europe after the Russia-Ukraine Conflict," Papers 2605.16334, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.16334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.16334
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.16334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.