IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2605.15778.html

Clearing in Liability Networks via Sheaves on Directed Hypergraphs

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Ghrist

Abstract

We associate to a decorated liability network a liability sheaf on a directed hypergraph whose hyperedges separate the distribution of payments from the collection of receipts. Clearing configurations are precisely the global sections of this sheaf, and the global-section object is canonically the equalizer of the identity and a clearing operator $\Phi=A\circ D$ factored into collective distribution $D$ and aggregation $A$; an institution-edge duality identifies it equivalently with the equalizer of the dual operator $D\circ A$ on the edge side. This identifies liability clearing as a finite-limit construction in the ambient data category. The construction is functorial under change of coefficient category: a Clearing Invariance Theorem shows that a finite-limit-preserving functor compatible with constraint subobjects induces a canonical isomorphism on global-section objects, enabling uniform comparison of clearing problems across categories of payment data. Existence, uniqueness, and iterative computation of clearing sections are organized by the structure carried on payment objects: Tarski's theorem yields existence and a complete-lattice structure under complete-lattice global elements; Scott continuity refines this to convergent Kleene iteration; an acyclic underlying graph admits a unique clearing section in finitely many steps with no order or metric hypothesis; and Banach's theorem on global elements yields uniqueness under metric contraction. The Eisenberg--Noe model and lattice liability networks arise as special cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Ghrist, 2026. "Clearing in Liability Networks via Sheaves on Directed Hypergraphs," Papers 2605.15778, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.15778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.15778
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glasserman, Paul & Young, H. Peyton, 2015. "How likely is contagion in financial networks?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 383-399.
    2. L. C. G. Rogers & L. A. M. Veraart, 2013. "Failure and Rescue in an Interbank Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(4), pages 882-898, April.
    3. Zachary Feinstein, 2017. "Obligations with Physical Delivery in a Multi-Layered Financial Network," Papers 1702.07936, arXiv.org, revised May 2019.
    4. Capponi, Agostino & Chen, Peng-Chu, 2015. "Systemic risk mitigation in financial networks," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 152-166.
    5. Gandy, Axel & Veraart, Luitgard A. M., 2017. "A Bayesian methodology for systemic risk assessment in financial networks," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 66312, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Banerjee, Tathagata & Bernstein, Alex & Feinstein, Zachary, 2025. "Dynamic clearing and contagion in financial networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 321(2), pages 664-675.
    7. Larry Eisenberg & Thomas H. Noe, 2001. "Systemic Risk in Financial Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 236-249, February.
    8. Matthew Elliott & Benjamin Golub & Matthew O. Jackson, 2014. "Financial Networks and Contagion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(10), pages 3115-3153, October.
    9. Robert Ghrist & Julian Gould & Miguel Lopez & Hans Riess, 2025. "Clearing Sections of Lattice Liability Networks," Papers 2503.17836, arXiv.org.
    10. Gai, Prasanna & Haldane, Andrew & Kapadia, Sujit, 2011. "Complexity, concentration and contagion," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 453-470.
    11. Kartik Anand & Ben Craig & Goetz von Peter, 2015. "Filling in the blanks: network structure and interbank contagion," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 625-636, April.
    12. Axel Gandy & Luitgard A. M. Veraart, 2017. "A Bayesian Methodology for Systemic Risk Assessment in Financial Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 4428-4446, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feihong Hu & Daniel Mitchell & Stathis Tompaidis, 2024. "Robust Financial Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(5), pages 1827-1842, September.
    2. Tathagata Banerjee & Zachary Feinstein, 2022. "Pricing of Debt and Equity in a Financial Network with Comonotonic Endowments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(4), pages 2085-2100, July.
    3. Zachary Feinstein & Weijie Pang & Birgit Rudloff & Eric Schaanning & Stephan Sturm & Mackenzie Wildman, 2017. "Sensitivity of the Eisenberg-Noe clearing vector to individual interbank liabilities," Papers 1708.01561, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2018.
    4. Robert Ghrist & Julian Gould & Miguel Lopez & Hans Riess, 2025. "Clearing Sections of Lattice Liability Networks," Papers 2503.17836, arXiv.org.
    5. Chen, Yu & Jin, Shuyue & Wang, Xiasi, 2021. "Solvency contagion risk in the Chinese commercial banks’ network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 580(C).
    6. Marco Bardoscia & Paolo Barucca & Stefano Battiston & Fabio Caccioli & Giulio Cimini & Diego Garlaschelli & Fabio Saracco & Tiziano Squartini & Guido Caldarelli, 2021. "The Physics of Financial Networks," Papers 2103.05623, arXiv.org.
    7. Hamed Amini & Zhongyuan Cao & Agnès Sulem, 2024. "Limit Theorems for Default Contagion and Systemic Risk," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 2652-2683, November.
    8. Aoxin Zhang & Yingzhe Wang, 2026. "Controlled McKean--Vlasov Contagion with State-Dependent Killing," Papers 2605.24833, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    9. Dohyun Ahn & Nan Chen & Kyoung-Kuk Kim, 2024. "Robust Risk Quantification via Shock Propagation in Financial Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(1), pages 1-18, January.
    10. David Aikman & Daniel Beale & Adam Brinley-Codd & Anne-Caroline Hüser & Giovanni Covi & Caterina Lepore, 2023. "Macro-Prudential Stress Test Models: A Survey," IMF Working Papers 2023/173, International Monetary Fund.
    11. Dohyun Ahn & Agostino Capponi, 2026. "Efficient Monte Carlo Valuation of Corporate Bonds in Financial Networks," Papers 2602.12770, arXiv.org.
    12. Maxim Bichuch & Zachary Feinstein, 2020. "A Repo Model of Fire Sales with VWAP and LOB Pricing Mechanisms," Papers 2005.05364, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    13. Ahn, Dohyun & Kim, Kyoung-Kuk & Kwon, Eunji, 2023. "Multivariate stress scenario selection in interbank networks," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    14. Lei Song & Yu Chen, 2025. "Does a non-performing assets disposal fund help control systemic risk? Evidence from an interbank financial network in China," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-45, December.
    15. Luitgard Anna Maria Veraart, 2020. "Distress and default contagion in financial networks," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 705-737, July.
    16. Tathagata Banerjee & Zachary Feinstein, 2018. "Impact of Contingent Payments on Systemic Risk in Financial Networks," Papers 1805.08544, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2018.
    17. Hamed Amini & Zachary Feinstein, 2020. "Optimal Network Compression," Papers 2008.08733, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    18. Hamed Amini & Zhongyuan Cao & Agnes Sulem, 2021. "Limit Theorems for Default Contagion and Systemic Risk," Papers 2104.00248, arXiv.org.
    19. Marco Bardoscia & Paolo Barucca & Adam Brinley Codd & John Hill, 2017. "The decline of solvency contagion risk," Bank of England working papers 662, Bank of England.
    20. Chen, Naixi & Fan, Hong, 2023. "Credit risk contagion and optimal dual control—An SIS/R model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 448-472.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.15778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.