IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2605.06678.html

A Wasserstein GAN-based climate scenario generator for risk management and insurance: the case of soil subsidence

Author

Listed:
  • Antoine Heranval

    (BioSP)

  • Olivier Lopez

    (CREST)

  • Didier Ngatcha

    (CREST)

  • Daniel Nkameni

    (CREST)

Abstract

According to the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2025), the average annual cost of natural catastrophes increased from 70--80 billion USD between 1970 and 2000 to 180--200 billion USD between 2001 and 2020. Reports from organizations such as the IFOA and the WWF highlight the need for the insurance sector to adapt to this rapidly evolving context by developing medium- to long-term strategies that go beyond the one-year horizon of prudential regulations such as Solvency II. This paper introduces an artificial intelligence framework based on Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (Conditional GANs) to generate future spatio-temporal trajectories of climatic indices. The approach focuses on the Soil Wetness Index (SWI), a key indicator used in France to assess drought severity. Drought accounts for approximately 30% of the indemnities paid under the French natural catastrophe insurance scheme. The proposed model, SwiGAN, simulates plausible drought propagation patterns up to 2050 for a region of France particularly exposed to this hazard. By generating realistic sequences of SWI maps, SwiGAN provides insights into drought dynamics under climate change scenarios and supports the design of adaptive risk management and insurance strategies. The methodology is also generalizable to other climate-related perils and actuarial applications such as economic scenario generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoine Heranval & Olivier Lopez & Didier Ngatcha & Daniel Nkameni, 2026. "A Wasserstein GAN-based climate scenario generator for risk management and insurance: the case of soil subsidence," Papers 2605.06678, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.06678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.06678
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Li & Yinxue Luo & Zhanbin Li & Guoce Xu & Mengjing Guo & Fengyou Gu, 2025. "Analysis of Spatiotemporal Variability and Drivers of Soil Moisture in the Ziwuling Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Robert Buch & Stefanie Grimm & Ralf Korn & Ivo Richert, 2023. "Estimating the Value-at-Risk by Temporal VAE," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Mohan Jiang & Yaxin Liang & Siyuan Han & Kunyuan Ma & Yuan Chen & Zhen Xu, 2024. "Leveraging Generative Adversarial Networks for Addressing Data Imbalance in Financial Market Supervision," Papers 2412.15222, arXiv.org.
    4. Solveig Flaig & Gero Junike, 2022. "Scenario Generation for Market Risk Models Using Generative Neural Networks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-28, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Szymon Kubiak & Tillman Weyde & Oleksandr Galkin & Dan Philps & Ram Gopal, 2023. "Improved Data Generation for Enhanced Asset Allocation: A Synthetic Dataset Approach for the Fixed Income Universe," Papers 2311.16004, arXiv.org.
    2. Francesca Biagini & Lukas Gonon & Niklas Walter, 2024. "Universal randomised signatures for generative time series modelling," Papers 2406.10214, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    3. Zhu, Felix & Dong, Yumo & Huang, Fei, 2025. "Data-rich economic forecasting for actuarial applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    4. Gero Junike & Hauke Stier & Marcus C. Christiansen, 2022. "Profit and loss decomposition in continuous time and approximations," Papers 2212.06733, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    5. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Clemente, Gian Paolo & Rabitti, Giovanni, 2024. "Why insurance regulators need to require sensitivity settings of internal models for their approval," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    6. Masoud Soleimani, 2025. "LLM-Generated Counterfactual Stress Scenarios for Portfolio Risk Simulation via Hybrid Prompt-RAG Pipeline," Papers 2512.07867, arXiv.org.
    7. Himanshu Choudhary & Arishi Orra & Manoj Thakur, 2025. "Diffusion-Augmented Reinforcement Learning for Robust Portfolio Optimization under Stress Scenarios," Papers 2510.07099, arXiv.org.
    8. Alexandru Isaic-Maniu & Irina-Maria Dragan & Ana-Maria Grigore & Florentina Constantin, 2023. "Taguchi Risk and Process Capability," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-12, October.
    9. Gero Junike & Solveig Flaig & Ralf Werner, 2023. "Validation of machine learning based scenario generators," Papers 2301.12719, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.06678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.