IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2605.02598.html

What Jobs Can AI Learn? Measuring Exposure by Reinforcement Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Moreira Tomei
  • Bouke Klein Teeselink

Abstract

Which jobs can AI learn to do? We examine this for every occupation in the US economy. Existing indices measure the overlap between AI capabilities and occupational tasks rather than which tasks AI systems can learn to perform, and as a result misclassify occupations where the gap between present capability and learnability is large. Reinforcement learning in post-training, now the dominant paradigm at the frontier, is structured around task completion and maps more directly onto the task-based architecture of occupational classifications than prior approaches. Using LLM annotators guided by a rubric developed with RL experts and validated against confirmed deployment cases, we score all 17,951 ONET tasks for training feasibility and aggregate to the occupation level, producing an RL Feasibility Index. The index diverges sharply from existing AI exposure measures for specific occupation groups: power plant operators, railroad conductors, and aircraft cargo handling supervisors score high on RL feasibility but low on general AI exposure, while creative and interpersonal roles (musicians, physicians, natural sciences managers) show the reverse. These divergences carry direct implications for policy interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Moreira Tomei & Bouke Klein Teeselink, 2026. "What Jobs Can AI Learn? Measuring Exposure by Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2605.02598, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.02598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.02598
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth Appel & Peter McCrory & Alex Tamkin & Miles McCain & Tyler Neylon & Michael Stern, 2025. "Anthropic Economic Index report: Uneven geographic and enterprise AI adoption," Papers 2511.15080, arXiv.org.
    2. Daron Acemoglu & David Autor & Jonathon Hazell & Pascual Restrepo, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence and Jobs: Evidence from Online Vacancies," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(S1), pages 293-340.
    3. Kiran Tomlinson & Sonia Jaffe & Will Wang & Scott Counts & Siddharth Suri, 2025. "Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations," Papers 2507.07935, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    4. David H. Autor & David Dorn, 2013. "The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(5), pages 1553-1597, August.
    5. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(4), pages 1279-1333.
    6. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue nov.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prashant Garg & Tommaso Crosta & Jasmin Baier, 2026. "Global Automation Atlas," Papers 2605.17086, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Hellsten & Giuseppe Pulito & Sarah Schroeder, 2026. "Automation and the Changing Composition of Skill Demand," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 26122, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    2. Qiao, Xiaole & He, Yang & Du, Qiang, 2025. "How does the urban digital economy drive labor allocation in China?—A perspective of factor mobility between digital and non-digital enterprises," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1159-1175.
    3. Mane, Klint & Park, Geunyong & Shen, Ande, 2025. "High-tech clusters, labor demand, and inequality: Evidence from “Made in China 2025”," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Arntz, Melanie & Genz, Sabrina & Gregory, Terry & Lehmer, Florian & Zierahn-Weilage, Ulrich, 2024. "De-Routinization in the Fourth Industrial Revolution - Firm-Level Evidence," IZA Discussion Papers 16740, IZA Network @ LISER.
    5. Wen Zhang & Kee-Hung Lai & Qiguo Gong, 2024. "The future of the labor force: higher cognition and more skills," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Stefania Albanesi & António Dias da Silva & Juan F Jimeno & Ana Lamo & Alena Wabitsch, 2025. "New technologies and jobs in Europe," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 40(121), pages 71-139.
    7. Jiang, Wei & Tang, Yuehua & Xiao, Rachel J. & Yao, Vincent, 2025. "Surviving the fintech disruption," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    8. Armanda Cetrulo & Dario Guarascio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2024. "Two neglected origins of inequality: hierarchical power and care work," LEM Papers Series 2024/04, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    9. Michelle Yin & Burhan Ogut, 2026. "Who Uses AI? Platform Selection and the Measurement of Occupational AI Exposure," Papers 2605.21743, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    10. Chunyang Su & Lin Zhang, 2025. "Industrial robots, social networks, and the gig economy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 74(3), pages 1-26, September.
    11. Zou, Yanchi & Li, Kun & He, Lilong & Guo, Jiapei, 2025. "The employment effects of ICT investment: Evidence from the U.S. Commuting Zones," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    12. Sebastian, Raquel & Salas-Rojo, Pedro & C. Palomino, Juan & G. Rodríguez, Juan, 2026. "New technologies and the rise of wage inequality," INET Oxford Working Papers 2026-04, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    13. Francesco Carbonero & Sergio Scicchitano, 2025. "Labour and technology at the time of COVID-19: can artificial intelligence mitigate the need for proximity?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 1167-1203, December.
    14. Benítez, Miguel & Parrado, Eric, 2024. "Mirror, Mirror on the Wall: Which Jobs Will AI Replace After All?: A New Index of Occupational Exposure," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 13696, Inter-American Development Bank.
    15. Mathieu P.A. Steijn, 2024. "The persistence and nature of the labor reallocation shock during the COVID-19 crisis," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-047/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    16. Grenz, Sabrina & Gregory, Terry & Lehmer, Florian, 2026. "AI-Powered Skill Classification: Mapping Technology Intensity in the German Labor Market," IZA Discussion Papers 18415, IZA Network @ LISER.
    17. Wang, Wei & Wang, Qianwen, 2025. "Does the digital economy boost enterprise labor demand? An empirical analysis of typical listed firms in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1112-1130.
    18. Yoon, Chungeun, 2023. "Technology adoption and jobs: The effects of self-service kiosks in restaurants on labor outcomes," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    19. Bone, Matthew & González Ehlinger, Eugenia & Stephany, Fabian, 2025. "Skills or degree? The rise of skill-based hiring for AI and green jobs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    20. Tommaso AGASISTI & Geraint JOHNES & Marco PACCAGNELLA, 2021. "Tasks, occupations and wages in OECD countries," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 160(1), pages 85-112, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.02598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.