IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2605.02598.html

What Jobs Can AI Learn? Measuring Exposure by Reinforcement Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Moreira Tomei
  • Bouke Klein Teeselink

Abstract

Which jobs can AI learn to do? We examine this for every occupation in the US economy. Existing indices measure the overlap between AI capabilities and occupational tasks rather than which tasks AI systems can learn to perform, and as a result misclassify occupations where the gap between present capability and learnability is large. Reinforcement learning in post-training, now the dominant paradigm at the frontier, is structured around task completion and maps more directly onto the task-based architecture of occupational classifications than prior approaches. Using LLM annotators guided by a rubric developed with RL experts and validated against confirmed deployment cases, we score all 17,951 ONET tasks for training feasibility and aggregate to the occupation level, producing an RL Feasibility Index. The index diverges sharply from existing AI exposure measures for specific occupation groups: power plant operators, railroad conductors, and aircraft cargo handling supervisors score high on RL feasibility but low on general AI exposure, while creative and interpersonal roles (musicians, physicians, natural sciences managers) show the reverse. These divergences carry direct implications for policy interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Moreira Tomei & Bouke Klein Teeselink, 2026. "What Jobs Can AI Learn? Measuring Exposure by Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2605.02598, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.02598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.02598
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth Appel & Peter McCrory & Alex Tamkin & Miles McCain & Tyler Neylon & Michael Stern, 2025. "Anthropic Economic Index report: Uneven geographic and enterprise AI adoption," Papers 2511.15080, arXiv.org.
    2. Daron Acemoglu & David Autor & Jonathon Hazell & Pascual Restrepo, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence and Jobs: Evidence from Online Vacancies," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(S1), pages 293-340.
    3. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2019. "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 3-30, Spring.
    4. Kiran Tomlinson & Sonia Jaffe & Will Wang & Scott Counts & Siddharth Suri, 2025. "Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations," Papers 2507.07935, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    5. David H. Autor & David Dorn, 2013. "The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(5), pages 1553-1597, August.
    6. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Nov.
    7. Ljubica Nedelkoska & Glenda Quintini, 2018. "Automation, skills use and training," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 202, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prashant Garg & Tommaso Crosta & Jasmin Baier, 2026. "Global Automation Atlas," Papers 2605.17086, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dawei (David) Zhang & Gang Peng & Yuliang Yao & Tyson R. Browning, 2024. "Is a College Education Still Enough? The IT-Labor Relationship with Education Level, Task Routineness, and Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 992-1010, September.
    2. Caselli, Mauro & Fracasso, Andrea & Scicchitano, Sergio & Traverso, Silvio & Tundis, Enrico, 2025. "What workers and robots do: An activity-based analysis of the impact of robotization on changes in local employment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    3. Montobbio, Fabio & Staccioli, Jacopo & Virgillito, Maria Enrica & Vivarelli, Marco, 2022. "Robots and the origin of their labour-saving impact," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Fernández-Macías, Enrique & Klenert, David & Antón, José-Ignacio, 2021. "Not so disruptive yet? Characteristics, distribution and determinants of robots in Europe," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 76-89.
    5. FUKAO, Kyoji & IKEUCHI, Kenta & NAGAYA, Yoshiaki & PERUGINI, Cristiano & POMPEI, Fabrizio, 2026. "Automation Risk, Innovative Capital, and Labour Market Outcomes : Evidence from Japan," CEI Working Paper Series 2026-03, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    6. Qiao, Xiaole & He, Yang & Du, Qiang, 2025. "How does the urban digital economy drive labor allocation in China?—A perspective of factor mobility between digital and non-digital enterprises," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1159-1175.
    7. Tianren Li & Yao Hu & Jiachao Peng & Fushun Zhang, 2026. "Artificial intelligence, greening of occupational structure and total factor energy efficiency," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Wen Zhang & Kee-Hung Lai & Qiguo Gong, 2024. "The future of the labor force: higher cognition and more skills," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Choi, Taelim & Leigh, Nancey Green, 2024. "Artificial intelligence's creation and displacement of labor demand," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    10. Roberto Antonietti & Luca Cattani & Francesca Gambarotto & Giulio Pedrini, 2021. "Education, routine, and complexity-biased Knowledge Enabling Technologies: Evidence from Emilia-Romagna, Italy," Discussion Paper series in Regional Science & Economic Geography 2021-07, Gran Sasso Science Institute, Social Sciences, revised May 2021.
    11. Andreas Stöckl & Olaf Struck, 2025. "Continuous vocational education and training and new technologies: on the importance of educational level and technology in the workplace," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 59(1), pages 1-21, December.
    12. Lee, Seungil & Park, Jungsoo, 2026. "Impact of digital transformation technology adoption on worker wages," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    13. Chunyang Su & Lin Zhang, 2025. "Industrial robots, social networks, and the gig economy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 74(3), pages 1-26, September.
    14. Alonso, Cristian & Berg, Andrew & Kothari, Siddharth & Papageorgiou, Chris & Rehman, Sidra, 2022. "Will the AI revolution cause a great divergence?," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 18-37.
    15. Francesco Carbonero & Sergio Scicchitano, 2025. "Labour and technology at the time of COVID-19: can artificial intelligence mitigate the need for proximity?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 15(4), pages 1167-1203, December.
    16. Sylvie Blasco, 2022. "Replaced or depressed? The effect of automation risk on workers' mental health," French Stata Users' Group Meetings 2022 09, Stata Users Group.
    17. Bratanova, A. & Mason, C. & Evans, D. & Schleiger, E. & Grimberg, E. & Walker, G. & Pham, H. & Bulled, K., 2026. "Truck drivers and automation: A methodology for identifying and supporting workforce transition in the Australian road freight sector," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    18. Blasco, Sylvie & Rochut, Julie & Rouland, Benedicte, 2022. "Displaced or Depressed? The Effect of Working in Automatable Jobs on Mental Health," IZA Discussion Papers 15434, IZA Network @ LISER.
    19. Caselli, Mauro & Fracasso, Andrea & Scicchitano, Sergio & Traverso, Silvio & Tundis, Enrico, 2021. "Stop worrying and love the robot: An activity-based approach to assess the impact of robotization on employment dynamics," GLO Discussion Paper Series 802, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    20. Nikolova, Milena & Cnossen, Femke & Nikolaev, Boris, 2024. "Robots, meaning, and self-determination," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(5).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.02598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.