IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2604.23961.html

Extended State-dependent Hawkes Process for Limit Order Books: Mathematical Foundation and the Reproduction of Volatility Signature Plots

Author

Listed:
  • Akitoshi Kimura

Abstract

This paper proposes an Extended State-Dependent Hawkes Process (ExsdHawkes) to model the intricate dynamics of Limit Order Books (LOBs). Our theoretical contribution lies in relaxing traditional constraints by allowing for state disappearances -- a phenomenon frequently observed in high-frequency trading. We mathematically prove, using Karush--Kuhn--Tucker (KKT) conditions, that the maximum likelihood estimation remains separable, justifying an efficient two-step procedure. In the empirical section, we apply our model to three months of high-frequency tick data of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (8306). We demonstrate that ExsdHawkes uniquely reproduces the volatility signature plot's characteristic upward slope by capturing the "local super-criticality" triggered during disequilibrium states. Crucially, we identify Marketable Limit Orders (MLO) as the primary catalyst that forces the LOB into these unstable states. Comparative analysis reveals that models lacking physical constraints (e.g., standard SD-Hawkes) suffer from explosive branching ratios and fail to maintain simulation stability. Our findings suggest that physical consistency is not merely a mathematical nicety, but a prerequisite for accurately modeling macro-level volatility. By enforcing the physical geometry to `pause' the residual accumulation during inadmissible periods, ExsdHawkes uniquely maintains statistical integrity where unconstrained models succumb to structural bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Akitoshi Kimura, 2026. "Extended State-dependent Hawkes Process for Limit Order Books: Mathematical Foundation and the Reproduction of Volatility Signature Plots," Papers 2604.23961, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.23961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.23961
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vladimir Filimonov & Didier Sornette, 2012. "Quantifying reflexivity in financial markets: towards a prediction of flash crashes," Papers 1201.3572, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2012.
    2. Large, Jeremy, 2007. "Measuring the resiliency of an electronic limit order book," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Maxime Morariu-Patrichi & Mikko S. Pakkanen, 2022. "State-dependent Hawkes processes and their application to limit order book modelling," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 563-583, March.
    4. Vladimir Filimonov & Didier Sornette, 2012. "Quantifying Reflexivity in Financial Markets: Towards a Prediction of Flash Crashes," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 12-02, Swiss Finance Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anatoliy Swishchuk & Aiden Huffman, 2020. "General Compound Hawkes Processes in Limit Order Books," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Hai-Chuan Xu & Wei-Xing Zhou, 2020. "Modeling aggressive market order placements with Hawkes factor models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Choi, So Eun & Jang, Hyun Jin & Lee, Kyungsub & Zheng, Harry, 2021. "Optimal market-Making strategies under synchronised order arrivals with deep neural networks," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Ying Chen & Ulrich Horst & Hoang Hai Tran, 2026. "Optimal Trade Execution Under Endogenous Order Flow," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(1), pages 72-92, January.
    5. Zhuohan Wang & Carmine Ventre, 2025. "DiffVolume: Diffusion Models for Volume Generation in Limit Order Books," Papers 2508.08698, arXiv.org.
    6. Mathieu Rosenbaum & Jianfei Zhang, 2022. "On the universality of the volatility formation process: when machine learning and rough volatility agree," Papers 2206.14114, arXiv.org.
    7. Lirong Cui & Didier Sornette, 2025. "Expectations of Linear and Nonlinear Hawkes Processes Using a Field-Theoretical Approach," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 30(1), pages 63-88, March.
    8. Mariko I Ito & Yudai Honma & Takaaki Ohnishi & Tsutomu Watanabe & Kazuyuki Aihara, 2024. "Exogenous and endogenous factors affecting stock market transactions: A Hawkes process analysis of the Tokyo Stock Exchange during the COVID-19 pandemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Hai-Chuan Xu & Wei Chen & Xiong Xiong & Wei Zhang & Wei-Xing Zhou & H Eugene Stanley, 2016. "Limit-order book resiliency after effective market orders: Spread, depth and intensity," Papers 1602.00731, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2017.
    10. Filimonov, Vladimir & Bicchetti, David & Maystre, Nicolas & Sornette, Didier, 2014. "Quantification of the high level of endogeneity and of structural regime shifts in commodity markets," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 174-192.
    11. Swishchuk, Anatoliy & Zagst, Rudi & Zeller, Gabriela, 2021. "Hawkes processes in insurance: Risk model, application to empirical data and optimal investment," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PA), pages 107-124.
    12. repec:wsi:acsxxx:v:21:y:2018:i:08:n:s0219525918500194 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Yonatan Berman & Yoash Shapira & Eshel Ben-Jacob, 2014. "Unraveling Hidden Order in the Dynamics of Developed and Emerging Markets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-10, November.
    14. Anatoliy Swishchuk & Aiden Huffman, 2018. "General Compound Hawkes Processes in Limit Order Books," Papers 1812.02298, arXiv.org.
    15. Fry, John & Cheah, Eng-Tuck, 2016. "Negative bubbles and shocks in cryptocurrency markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 343-352.
    16. Didier Sornette & Peter Cauwels, 2014. "1980–2008: The Illusion of the Perpetual Money Machine and What It Bodes for the Future," Risks, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-29, April.
    17. Feng Shi & John Paul Broussard & G. Geoffrey Booth, 2025. "The complex nature of financial market microstructure: the case of a stock market crash," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 20(1), pages 1-40, January.
    18. Maillart, Thomas & Sornette, Didier, 2019. "Aristotle vs. Ringelmann: On superlinear production in open source software," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 964-972.
    19. Antoine Fosset & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Michael Benzaquen, 2020. "Non-parametric Estimation of Quadratic Hawkes Processes for Order Book Events," Papers 2005.05730, arXiv.org.
    20. Sobin Joseph & Shashi Jain, 2023. "A neural network based model for multi-dimensional nonlinear Hawkes processes," Papers 2303.03073, arXiv.org.
    21. Varun Narayan Kannan Pillai & Akshay Ajith & Sumesh K J, 2026. "Generating Alpha: A Hybrid AI-Driven Trading System Integrating Technical Analysis, Machine Learning and Financial Sentiment for Regime-Adaptive Equity Strategies," Papers 2601.19504, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.23961. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.