IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2604.22069.html

Liquidity provision in CLMMs: evidence from transactions data

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey Urusov
  • Rostislav Berezovskiy
  • Anatoly Krestenko
  • Andrei Kornilov

Abstract

The emergence of Concentrated Liquidity Market Makers (CLMMs) has made liquidity provision on decentralized exchanges an active and risk-sensitive task. However, the standalone profitability of liquidity provision remains unclear for liquidity providers (LPs) who neither hedge their inventory risk nor receive off-pool profits. This paper studies the actual outcomes of LP activity using historical transaction-level data from WETH/USD liquidity pools on the Base chain across the Uniswap, Aerodrome, PancakeSwap and SushiSwap protocols. We propose a methodology for reconstructing LP PnL dynamics from on-chain events and introduce an original metric that captures both the terminal state of LP capital and its path over time. Based on this framework, we estimate the share of successful LPs, classify their behavior and develop a taxonomy of 15 position types as structural components of PnL. We further identify a distinct class of multi-LPs operating across several pools and show that the dominant profitable position configurations are concentrated around the current pool price. The results show that only about one out of six LPs avoids losses in the selected market segment, raising an open question about the true economic motives of LP participation. Evidence also suggests that successful LPs often close positions before the full range is traversed, making observed behavior closer to profit-target-based strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey Urusov & Rostislav Berezovskiy & Anatoly Krestenko & Andrei Kornilov, 2026. "Liquidity provision in CLMMs: evidence from transactions data," Papers 2604.22069, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.22069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.22069
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erhan Bayraktar & Asaf Cohen & April Nellis, 2024. "DEX Specs: A Mean Field Approach to DeFi Currency Exchanges," Papers 2404.09090, arXiv.org.
    2. Álvaro Cartea & Fayçal Drissi & Marcello Monga, 2023. "Predictable Losses of Liquidity Provision in Constant Function Markets and Concentrated Liquidity Markets," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 69-93, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrey Urusov & Rostislav Berezovskiy & Anatoly Krestenko & Andrei Kornilov & Yury Yanovich, 2025. "Dynamic Liquidity Provision in Decentralized Markets: Strategy Optimization and Performance Evaluation in Concentrated Liquidity AMMs," Papers 2505.15338, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    2. Agostino Capponi & 'Alvaro Cartea & Fayc{c}al Drissi, 2026. "The Viability of Blockchain Markets under Discrete Clearing and Paid Priority," Papers 2605.17425, arXiv.org.
    3. Masaaki Fukasawa & Basile Maire & Marcus Wunsch, 2025. "Liquidity provision of utility indifference type in decentralized exchanges," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 255-273, June.
    4. Leonardo Baggiani & Martin Herdegen & Leandro S'anchez-Betancourt, 2025. "Optimal Dynamic Fees in Automated Market Makers," Papers 2506.02869, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    5. Alexander Lipton, 2024. "Hydrodynamics of Markets:Hidden Links Between Physics and Finance," Papers 2403.09761, arXiv.org.
    6. Alexander Lipton, 2023. "Kelvin Waves, Klein-Kramers and Kolmogorov Equations, Path-Dependent Financial Instruments: Survey and New Results," Papers 2309.04547, arXiv.org.
    7. 'Alvaro Cartea & Fayc{c}al Drissi & Marcello Monga, 2023. "Decentralised Finance and Automated Market Making: Predictable Loss and Optimal Liquidity Provision," Papers 2309.08431, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    8. Sunghun Ko, 2026. "Partially Active Automated Market Makers," Papers 2602.09887, arXiv.org.
    9. Philippe Bergault & Louis Bertucci & David Bouba & Olivier Gu'eant & Julien Guilbert, 2024. "Price-Aware Automated Market Makers: Models Beyond Brownian Prices and Static Liquidity," Papers 2405.03496, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    10. Daniele Maria Di Nosse & Federico Gatta, 2024. "A Multi-step Approach for Minimizing Risk in Decentralized Exchanges," Papers 2406.07200, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    11. Leonardo Baggiani & Martin Herdegen & Leandro Sanchez-Betancourt, 2026. "Competition between DEXs through Dynamic Fees," Papers 2603.09669, arXiv.org.
    12. Maxim Bichuch & Zachary Feinstein, 2025. "The Price of Liquidity: Implied Volatility of Automated Market Maker Fees," Papers 2509.23222, arXiv.org.
    13. Masaaki Fukasawa & Basile Maire & Marcus Wunsch, 2025. "Liquidity provision of utility indifference type in decentralized exchanges," Papers 2502.01931, arXiv.org.
    14. Cartea, Álvaro & Drissi, Fayçal & Monga, Marcello, 2025. "Decentralised finance and automated market making: Execution and speculation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    15. Maxim Bichuch & Zachary Feinstein, 2024. "A Derivative Pricing Perspective on Liquidity Tokens in Constant Product Market Makers," Papers 2409.11339, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    16. Abe Alexander & Lars Fritz, 2024. "Impermanent loss and loss-vs-rebalancing I: some statistical properties," Papers 2410.00854, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.22069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.