IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2604.19987.html

Routine Work, Firm Boundaries, and the Rise of Local Supplier Entry

Author

Listed:
  • Duha T. Altindag
  • Nabamita Dutta
  • John M. Nunley
  • R. Alan Seals
  • Adam Stivers

Abstract

Between 2005 and 2019, U.S. business applications rose 40 percent while conversion to employer firms fell by nearly half. We study whether boundary redrawing helps explain this pattern. Structured routine-cognitive work can be governed through deliverables and thinner buyer and supplier interfaces. When such work remains place-bound, outsourcing creates demand for domestic specialist suppliers. Across 722 commuting zones, a one percentage-point higher baseline routine employment share raises applications by 27.8 per 100,000 residents. Realized entry concentrates in micro-establishments, with no startup quality gains. Contract and industry evidence point to local supplier entry, not routine-manual displacement.

Suggested Citation

  • Duha T. Altindag & Nabamita Dutta & John M. Nunley & R. Alan Seals & Adam Stivers, 2026. "Routine Work, Firm Boundaries, and the Rise of Local Supplier Entry," Papers 2604.19987, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.19987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.19987
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annette Bernhardt & Rosemary L. Batt & Susan Houseman & Eileen Appelbaum, 2016. "Domestic Outsourcing in the United States: A Research Agenda to Assess Trends and Effects on Job Quality," Upjohn Working Papers 16-253, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
    2. Annette Bernhardt & Rosemary Batt & Susan Houseman & Eileen Appelbaum, 2016. "Working Paper: Domestic Outsourcing in the United States: A Research Agenda to Assess Trends and Effects on Job Quality," CEPR Reports and Issue Briefs 2016-03, Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bergeaud, Antonin & Mazet-Sonilhac, Clément & Malgouyres, Clément & Signorelli, Sara, 2021. "Technological Change and Domestic Outsourcing," IZA Discussion Papers 14603, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Nicola Gagliardi & Benoît Mahy & François Rycx, 2021. "Upstreamness, Wages and Gender: Equal Benefits for All?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 52-83, March.
    3. Sean O'Brady & Virginia Doellgast & David Blatter, 2024. "The high costs of outsourcing: Vendor errors, customer mistreatment, and well‐being in call centers," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(1), pages 80-103, January.
    4. Christine A. Riordan & Alexander M. Kowalski, 2021. "From Bread and Roses to #MeToo: Multiplicity, Distance, and the Changing Dynamics of Conflict in IR Theory," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(3), pages 580-606, May.
    5. Nicola Gagliardi & Benoît Mahy & François Rycx, 2019. "Does firms’ position in global value chains matter for workers’ wages?. An overview with a gender perspective," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(4), pages 55-62.
    6. John Schmitt, 2017. "Comments on “Domestic Outsourcing, Rent Seeking, and Increasing Inequality†by Eileen Appelbaum," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 49(4), pages 529-533, December.
    7. Matthew Dey & Susan Houseman, 2025. "The Rise of the Contract Workforce in US Manufacturing," NBER Chapters, in: The Changing Nature of Work, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Delgado, Mercedes & Mills, Karen G., 2020. "The supply chain economy: A new industry categorization for understanding innovation in services," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    9. Eileen Appelbaum, 2017. "Domestic Outsourcing, Rent Seeking, and Increasing Inequality," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 49(4), pages 513-528, December.
    10. Mayara Felix & Michael B. Wong, 2025. "Outsourcing, Labor Market Frictions, and Employment," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2416R1, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    11. Alexandre Mas & Amanda Pallais, 2020. "Alternative Work Arrangements," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 12(1), pages 631-658, August.
    12. Trond Flaarønning, 2025. "Union decline through extension of collective agreements?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 63(1), pages 100-129, March.
    13. Virginia Doellgast & Matthew Bidwell & Alexander J. S. Colvin, 2021. "New Directions in Employment Relations Theory: Understanding Fragmentation, Identity, and Legitimacy," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(3), pages 555-579, May.
    14. Wouter Zwysen, 2024. "Working apart: Domestic outsourcing in Europe," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 30(2), pages 221-241, June.
    15. Mayara Felix & Michael B. Wong, 2024. "The Reallocation Effects of Domestic Outsourcing," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2416, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    16. Hammerling, Jessie HF, 2022. "Financial Drivers of Domestic Outsourcing: Case Study of Food Services in the San Francisco Bay Area," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt9sz919zw, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    17. Andrea Atencio De Leon & Claudia Macaluso & Chen Yeh, 2023. "Outsourcing Dynamism," Working Papers 23-64, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    18. Broten, Nicholas & Dworsky, Michael & Powell, David, 2022. "Do temporary workers experience additional employment and earnings risk after workplace injuries?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.19987. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.