Author
Listed:
- Irene Aldridge
- Gavhar Annaeva
- Leyla Beriker
- Zhiheng Cai
- Samyak Choudhary
- Camila Godoy
- Kaicheng Gong
- Zitao Huang
- Jonah Ji
- Hetvi Kharvasiya
- Heng Li
- Yuxuan Li
- Tianchi Ma
- Qingcheng Meng
- Ruiyang Shi
- Ananya Shrivastava
- Jiaqi Wang
- Yifan Wang
- Zihua Wu
- Jiayang Xu
- Yuheng Yan
- Zijun Zeng
- Bowen Zhang
- Francesco Zhang
Abstract
Blockchain technology is widely expected to reduce transaction costs by automating contract enforcement and eliminating intermediaries; yet, the execution costs imposed by network congestion have received little attention in the operations management literature. We study on-chain peak shaving, the systematic scheduling of Ethereum transactions toward low-congestion windows to reduce gas fee exposure. We use transaction-level data from seven firms across seven industries (N = 62,142 transactions, January-March 2026). Gas fees vary significantly throughout the day: the peak-hour premium at 10 AM Eastern Time reaches USD 0.220 per transaction above the overnight baseline, driven primarily by speculative-arbitrage demand rather than operational activity. Firm-level scheduling responses are heterogeneous and not uniformly disciplined. Only three of seven firms transact disproportionately during off-peak hours; four transact counter-cyclically, concentrated in peak windows due to external deadlines or governance cycles. This heterogeneity is explained by two moderators: transaction deferrability and gas intensity. We formalize these into an On-Chain Scheduling Matrix that maps firms to four regimes: 1) full peak shaving, 2) selective peak shaving, 3) cost provisioning, and 4) accept-market-rate, with regime membership predicting both fee savings and residual cost floors (40-92 percent of actual expenditure). Theoretically, we extend Transaction Cost Economics to account for time-varying execution costs imposed by congestion externalities. In addition to extending Williamson's original cost taxonomy, we introduce a dual classification of gas fees as execution costs in timing but maladaptation costs in origin. The findings reposition on-chain gas-fee management alongside energy procurement and foreign exchange hedging as a domain requiring systematic operational planning.
Suggested Citation
Irene Aldridge & Gavhar Annaeva & Leyla Beriker & Zhiheng Cai & Samyak Choudhary & Camila Godoy & Kaicheng Gong & Zitao Huang & Jonah Ji & Hetvi Kharvasiya & Heng Li & Yuxuan Li & Tianchi Ma & Qingche, 2026.
"On-chain Peak Shaving,"
Papers
2604.19956, arXiv.org.
Handle:
RePEc:arx:papers:2604.19956
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.19956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.