IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2604.15463.html

Risk-Sensitive Investment Management via Free Energy-Entropy Duality

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastien Lleo
  • Wolfgang Runggaldier

Abstract

We study a benchmarked risk-sensitive portfolio problem in a factor-based setting to bring together three strands of the literature: benchmarked risk-sensitive investment management, the Kuroda-Nagai change-of-measure method, and the free energy-entropy duality of Dai Pra et al. (1996). We show that the duality yields a direct solution of the benchmarked problem by reformulating it as a linear-quadratic-Gaussian stochastic differential game under a suitable equivalent probability measure, with an entropic regularization. The resulting value function is quadratic, the optimal controls are explicit affine feedback maps, and the optimal allocation admits two complementary interpretations: as a fractional Kelly strategy and as a Kelly portfolio adjusted via the entropic regularization. This formulation, therefore, contributes both a direct analytical route to the solution and a clearer interpretation of risk sensitivity, thereby embedding the classical Kuroda-Nagai change-of-measure approach within a more general framework. An added benefit of this formulation is that it is suitable for implementation via an RL algorithm. A simple implementation on U.S. equity data illustrates the tractability of the framework and numerically confirms the equivalence of the two approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastien Lleo & Wolfgang Runggaldier, 2026. "Risk-Sensitive Investment Management via Free Energy-Entropy Duality," Papers 2604.15463, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.15463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.15463
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carhart, Mark M, 1997. "On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 57-82, March.
    2. Tomasz R. Bielecki & Stanley R. Pliska, 2003. "Economic Properties of the Risk Sensitive Criterion for Portfolio Management," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 2(2), pages 3-17, February.
    3. Mark Davis & SEBastien Lleo, 2008. "Risk-sensitive benchmarked asset management," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 415-426.
    4. Mark H.A. Davis & Sébastien Lleo, 2021. "Risk‐sensitive benchmarked asset management with expert forecasts," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1162-1189, October.
    5. Lleo, Sébastien & Runggaldier, Wolfgang J., 2024. "On the separation of estimation and control in risk-sensitive investment problems under incomplete observation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(1), pages 200-214.
    6. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 2015. "A five-factor asset pricing model," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 1-22.
    7. Hiroaki Hata, 2021. "Risk-Sensitive Asset Management with Lognormal Interest Rates," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 28(2), pages 169-206, June.
    8. Mark Davis & Sébastien Lleo, 2024. "Jump-diffusion risk-sensitive benchmarked asset management with traditional and alternative data," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(1), pages 661-689, May.
    9. Sébastien Lleo & Leonard C. MacLean, 2025. "Dual dominance: how Harry Markowitz and William Ziemba impacted portfolio management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(1), pages 181-216, March.
    10. Hiroaki Hata & Yasunari Iida, 2006. "A risk-sensitive stochastic control approach to an optimal investment problem with partial information," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 395-426, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sébastien Lleo & Leonard C. MacLean, 2025. "Dual dominance: how Harry Markowitz and William Ziemba impacted portfolio management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(1), pages 181-216, March.
    2. Sebastien Lleo & Wolfgang Runggaldier, 2025. "Exploratory Randomization for Discrete-Time Linear Exponential Quadratic Gaussian (LEQG) Problem," Papers 2501.06275, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    3. Mark H.A. Davis & Sébastien Lleo, 2021. "Risk‐sensitive benchmarked asset management with expert forecasts," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1162-1189, October.
    4. Shi, Huai-Long & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2022. "Factor volatility spillover and its implications on factor premia," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    5. Eun, Cheol & Lee, Kyuseok & Wei, Fengrong, 2023. "Dual role of the country factors in international asset pricing: The local factors and proxies for the global factors," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    6. Xu, Zhiwei & Yang, Yinan & Zhang, Teng, 2026. "Investor disagreement and state-dependent mispricing: New evidence on the analyst dispersion anomaly," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    7. Blasques, F. & Francq, Christian & Laurent, Sébastien, 2024. "Autoregressive conditional betas," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 238(2).
    8. Chang, Xiaochen & Guo, Songlin & Huang, Junkai, 2022. "Kidnapped mutual funds: Irrational preference of naive investors and fund incentive distortion," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Andrea Flori & Fabrizio Lillo & Fabio Pammolli & Alessandro Spelta, 2021. "Better to stay apart: asset commonality, bipartite network centrality, and investment strategies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 177-213, April.
    10. Cakici, Nusret & Zaremba, Adam, 2022. "Salience theory and the cross-section of stock returns: International and further evidence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 689-725.
    11. Cortez, Maria Céu & Andrade, Nuno & Silva, Florinda, 2022. "The environmental and financial performance of green energy investments: European evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    12. Chue, Timothy K. & Gul, Ferdinand A. & Mian, G. Mujtaba, 2019. "Aggregate investor sentiment and stock return synchronicity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    13. Monica Martinez-Blasco & Vanessa Serrano & Francesc Prior & Jordi Cuadros, 2023. "Analysis of an event study using the Fama–French five-factor model: teaching approaches including spreadsheets and the R programming language," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-34, December.
    14. Bradrania, Reza & Veron, Jose Francisco, 2023. "The beta anomaly in the Australian stock market and the lottery demand," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    15. Bakalli, Gaetan & Guerrier, Stéphane & Scaillet, Olivier, 2023. "A penalized two-pass regression to predict stock returns with time-varying risk premia," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 237(2).
    16. Francesco Busato & Cuono Massimo Coletta & Maria Manganiello, 2019. "Estimating the Cost of Equity Capital: Forecasting Accuracy for U.S. REIT Sector," International Real Estate Review, Asian Real Estate Society, vol. 22(3), pages 401-432.
    17. Po-Hsuan Hsu & Dongmei Li & Qin Li & Siew Hong Teoh & Kevin Tseng, 2022. "Valuation of New Trademarks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 257-279, January.
    18. Bagnara, Matteo & Vaucher, Benoit, 2025. "Risk diversification and extreme risk mitigation," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    19. Jeong, Giho & Kang, Jangkoo & Kwon, Kyung Yoon, 2018. "Liquidity skewness premium," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 130-150.
    20. Clemens Sialm & Hanjiang Zhang, 2020. "Tax‐Efficient Asset Management: Evidence from Equity Mutual Funds," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(2), pages 735-777, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.15463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.