IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2604.06116.html

Sequential Audit Sampling for Finite Populations with Exact and Simulation-based Guarantee

Author

Listed:
  • Masahiro Kato
  • Kei Nakagawa

Abstract

Financial statement auditors use a risk-based approach to evidence collection to obtain reasonable assurance. When an initial sample does not support a conclusion, they may inspect additional items. We develop a sampling procedure by formulating this additional inspection as sequential hypothesis testing for a fixed finite population sampled without replacement. A tolerable deviation rate and a margin below that rate define the composite hypotheses and the intervening indifference region, and lower and upper stopping boundaries control the two probabilities of incorrect conclusions. Under simple random sampling, a hypergeometric recursion computes the boundaries, decision probabilities, and expected sample size exactly. The procedure permits decisions at prespecified times, including fixed intervals. A separate extension imposes a fixed maximum sample size. We also consider one-sided error control and complete examination of selected items. When the state is multidimensional or has too many possible values for direct enumeration, Monte Carlo simulation constructs candidate boundaries. An independent simulation then provides one-sided upper confidence bounds for the two error probabilities at the least-favorable population counts.

Suggested Citation

  • Masahiro Kato & Kei Nakagawa, 2026. "Sequential Audit Sampling for Finite Populations with Exact and Simulation-based Guarantee," Papers 2604.06116, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.06116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.06116
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2604.06116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.