IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2603.15974.html

Flow Taxes, Stock Taxes, and Portfolio Choice: A Generalised Neutrality Result

Author

Listed:
  • Anders G Fr{o}seth

Abstract

A proportional wealth tax - a levy on the stock of wealth - preserves portfolio neutrality by acting as a uniform drift shift in the Fokker-Planck equation for wealth dynamics. We extend this result to the full system of ownership taxes (eierkostnader) that a shareholder faces: a corporate tax on gross profits, a capital income tax on the risk-free return, a dividend and capital gains tax on the excess return, and a wealth tax on net assets. Each tax modifies the drift of the wealth process in a distinct way - multiplicative rescaling, constant shift, or regime-dependent compression - while leaving the diffusion coefficient unchanged. We show that the combined system preserves portfolio neutrality under three conditions: (i) the capital income tax rate equals the corporate tax rate, (ii) the shielding rate equals the risk-free rate, and (iii) the wealth tax assessment is uniform across assets. When these conditions hold, the after-tax excess return is a uniform rescaling of the pre-tax excess return by the factor $(1-\tau_c)(1-\tau_d)$, and the drift-shift symmetry of the wealth-tax-only case generalises to a drift-shift-and-rescale symmetry. We classify the distortions that arise when each condition fails and show that flow-tax distortions and stock-tax distortions are additively separable: they do not interact. The shielding deduction - a feature of several real-world tax systems, including the Norwegian aksjonaermodellen - emerges as the mechanism that restores the symmetry between equity and debt taxation within this framework. Calibrated to the Norwegian dual income tax, conditions (i) and (ii) hold by institutional design; the only binding distortion is non-uniform wealth tax assessment, which generates portfolio tilts roughly 300 times larger than any residual flow-tax channel.

Suggested Citation

  • Anders G Fr{o}seth, 2026. "Flow Taxes, Stock Taxes, and Portfolio Choice: A Generalised Neutrality Result," Papers 2603.15974, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.15974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.15974
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Auerbach, Alan J, 1991. "Retrospective Capital Gains Taxation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 81(1), pages 167-178, March.
    2. Agnar Sandmo, 1977. "Portfolio Theory, Asset Demand and Taxation: Comparative Statics with Many Assets," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 44(2), pages 369-379.
    3. Marius Brülhart & Jonathan Gruber & Matthias Krapf & Kurt Schmidheiny, 2022. "Behavioral Responses to Wealth Taxes: Evidence from Switzerland," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 111-150, November.
    4. Katrine Jakobsen & Kristian Jakobsen & Henrik Kleven & Gabriel Zucman, 2020. "Wealth Taxation and Wealth Accumulation: Theory and Evidence From Denmark," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(1), pages 329-388.
    5. repec:ces:ifodic:v:2:y:2004:i:3:p:14567750 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Vidar Christiansen, 2004. "Norwegian Income Tax Reforms," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(03), pages 09-14, October.
    7. Petter Bjerksund & Guttorm Schjelderup, 2022. "Investor asset valuation under a wealth tax and a capital income tax," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 29(4), pages 873-889, August.
    8. Vidar Christiansen, 2004. "Norwegian Income Tax Reforms," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(3), pages 09-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacob, Martin, 2008. "Welche privaten Veräußerungsgewinne sollten besteuert werden?," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 49, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    2. Spencer Bastani & Daniel Waldenström, 2020. "How Should Capital Be Taxed?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 812-846, September.
    3. Florian Scheuer & Joel Slemrod, 2021. "Taxing Our Wealth," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 35(1), pages 207-230, Winter.
    4. Petter Bjerksund & Guttorm Schjelderup, 2022. "Investor asset valuation under a wealth tax and a capital income tax," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 29(4), pages 873-889, August.
    5. Spencer Bastani & Daniel Waldenström, 2023. "Taxing the wealthy: the choice between wealth and capital income taxation," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 39(3), pages 604-616.
    6. Fidrmuc, Jana P. & Jacob, Marcus, 2010. "Culture, agency costs, and dividends," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 321-339, September.
    7. Moore, Rachel & Pecoraro, Brandon, 2023. "Quantitative analysis of a wealth tax for the United States: Exclusions and expenditures," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Kristoffer Berg & Mr. Shafik Hebous, 2021. "Does a Wealth Tax Improve Equality of Opportunity? Evidence from Norway," IMF Working Papers 2021/085, International Monetary Fund.
    9. Robin Boadway & Kevin Spiritus, 2025. "Optimal taxation of normal and excess returns to risky assets," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 127(2), pages 366-389, April.
    10. Juliana Londoño-Vélez & Javier Ávila-Mahecha, 2021. "Enforcing Wealth Taxes in the Developing World: Quasi-experimental Evidence from Colombia," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 3(2), pages 131-148, June.
    11. Giampaolo Arachi & Massimo D'Antoni, 2022. "Taxation of capital gains upon accrual: is it really more efficient than realisation?," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 39-61, March.
    12. Glogowsky, Ulrich, 2021. "Behavioral responses to inheritance and gift taxation: Evidence from Germany," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    13. Seppo Kari & Hanna Karikallio, 2007. "Tax treatment of dividends and capital gains and the dividend decision under dual income tax," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 14(4), pages 427-456, August.
    14. Fella, Giulio & Blomhoff Holm, Martin & Pugh, Thomas M., 2024. "Saving after Retirement and Preferences for Residual Wealth," CEPR Discussion Papers 19233, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Fuest, Clemens, 2021. "Zur Debatte über die Einführung einer Nettovermögensteuer in Deutschland," Studien, Stiftung Familienunternehmen / Foundation for Family Businesses, number 250020.
    16. Beznoska, Martin & Hentze, Tobias, 2025. "Erbschaft- und Vermögensteuer in den Wahlprogrammen," IW policy papers 5/2025, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    17. Boar, Corina & Knowles, Matthew, 2024. "Optimal taxation of risky entrepreneurial capital," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    18. Peter Birch Sørensen, 2003. "Neutral Taxation of Shareholder Income: A Norwegian Tax Reform Proposal," CESifo Working Paper Series 1036, CESifo.
    19. Francisco García-Rodríguez, 2025. "Progresividad y Redistribución de la Imposición Patrimonial en España: un Análisis de Microsimulación con el Panel de Hogares," Studies on the Spanish Economy eee2025-19, FEDEA.
    20. Bernd Genser, 2006. "The Dual Income Tax: Implementation and Experience in European Countries," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0625, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.15974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.