IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2601.20238.html

Large Language Models Polarize Ideologically but Moderate Affectively in Online Political Discourse

Author

Listed:
  • Gavin Wang
  • Srinaath Anbudurai
  • Oliver Sun
  • Xitong Li
  • Lynn Wu

Abstract

The emergence of large language models (LLMs) is reshaping how people engage in political discourse online. We examine how the release of ChatGPT altered ideological and emotional patterns in the largest political forum on Reddit. Analysis of millions of comments shows that ChatGPT intensified ideological polarization: liberals became more liberal, and conservatives more conservative. This shift does not stem from the creation of more persuasive or ideologically extreme original content using ChatGPT. Instead, it originates from the tendency of ChatGPT-generated comments to echo and reinforce the viewpoint of original posts, a pattern consistent with algorithmic sycophancy. Yet, despite growing ideological divides, affective polarization, measured by hostility and toxicity, declined. These findings reveal that LLMs can simultaneously deepen ideological separation and foster more civil exchanges, challenging the long-standing assumption that extremity and incivility necessarily move together.

Suggested Citation

  • Gavin Wang & Srinaath Anbudurai & Oliver Sun & Xitong Li & Lynn Wu, 2026. "Large Language Models Polarize Ideologically but Moderate Affectively in Online Political Discourse," Papers 2601.20238, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2601.20238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.20238
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Rozado, 2023. "The Political Biases of ChatGPT," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-8, March.
    2. Mohsen Mosleh & Qi Yang & Tauhid Zaman & Gordon Pennycook & David G. Rand, 2024. "Differences in misinformation sharing can lead to politically asymmetric sanctions," Nature, Nature, vol. 634(8034), pages 609-616, October.
    3. Hamsa Bastani & Osbert Bastani & Alp Sungu & Haosen Ge & Özge Kabakcı & Rei Mariman, 2025. "Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 122(26), pages 2422633122-, July.
    4. Erik Brynjolfsson & Danielle Li & Lindsey Raymond, 2025. "Generative AI at Work," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(2), pages 889-942.
    5. Isaac Waller & Ashton Anderson, 2021. "Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms," Nature, Nature, vol. 600(7888), pages 264-268, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abendroth Dias Kulani & Arias Patricia & Bacco F. Manlio & Bassani Elias & Bertoletti Alice & Bertolini Lorenzo & Bertrand Astrid & Bili Danai & Boucher Philip & Cachia Romina & Ceresa Mario & Chaslot, 2025. "Generative AI Outlook Report," JRC Research Reports JRC142598, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Zara Contractor & Germ'an Reyes, 2025. "Generative AI in Higher Education: Evidence from an Elite College," Papers 2508.00717, arXiv.org.
    3. Cheng, Qiang & Lin, Pengkai & Zhao, Yue, 2025. "Does generative AI facilitate investor Trading? Early evidence from ChatGPT outages," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(2).
    4. Christoph Riedl & Eric Bogert, 2024. "Effects of AI Feedback on Learning, the Skill Gap, and Intellectual Diversity," Papers 2409.18660, arXiv.org.
    5. Carvajal, Daniel & Franco, Catalina & Isaksson, Siri, 2024. "Will Artificial Intelligence Get in the Way of Achieving Gender Equality?," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 3/2024, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics, revised 28 Apr 2025.
    6. Riccardo Zanardelli, 2025. "Navigating the safe harbor paradox in human-machine systems," Papers 2509.14057, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    7. Tatsuru Kikuchi, 2025. "Weather-Aware AI Systems versus Route-Optimization AI: A Comprehensive Analysis of AI Applications in Transportation Productivity," Papers 2507.17099, arXiv.org.
    8. Francesco Venturini, 2025. "Generative AI and Income Growth: Early Evidence on Global Data," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 31-46.
    9. Leonardo Banh & Gero Strobel, 2023. "Generative artificial intelligence," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Carlo Drago & Alberto Costantiello & Marco Savorgnan & Angelo Leogrande, 2025. "Macroeconomic and Labor Market Drivers of AI Adoption in Europe: A Machine Learning and Panel Data Approach," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-62, August.
    11. Alexander Cuntz & Carsten Fink & Hansueli Stamm, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property : An Economic Perspective," WIPO Economic Research Working Papers 77, World Intellectual Property Organization - Economics and Statistics Division.
    12. Leonardo Gambacorta & Enisse Kharroubi & Aaron Mehrotra & Livia Pancotto, 2026. "Economic impact of AI in emerging market economies," BIS Bulletins 121, Bank for International Settlements.
    13. Martin-Gutierrez, Samuel & Losada, Juan C. & Benito, Rosa M., 2023. "Multipolar social systems: Measuring polarization beyond dichotomous contexts," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    14. Fischer, Mira & Rau, Holger A. & Rilke, Rainer Michael, 2025. "AI tutoring enhances student learning without crowding out reading effort," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2025-203, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    15. Lilia Patrignani, 2024. "Understanding digital trade," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 841, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    16. Kiran Tomlinson & Sonia Jaffe & Will Wang & Scott Counts & Siddharth Suri, 2025. "Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations," Papers 2507.07935, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    17. David Rothschild, 2025. "Comment on "The Coasean Singularity? Demand, Supply, and Market Design with AI Agents"," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Transformative AI, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Feiyang Xu & Poonacha K. Medappa & Murat M. Tunc & Martijn Vroegindeweij & Jan C. Fransoo, 2025. "AI-Assisted Programming Decreases the Productivity of Experienced Developers by Increasing the Technical Debt and Maintenance Burden," Papers 2510.10165, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    19. Vesely, Stepan & Amaris, Gloria, 2025. "AI-driven income inequality and preferences for redistribution," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 642-648.
    20. Jiangbo Zhang & Yiyi Zhao, 2023. "Dynamics Analysis for the Random Homogeneous Biased Assimilation Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2601.20238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.