IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2601.10501.html

Semiparametric inference for inequality measures under nonignorable nonresponse using callback data

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyu Wang
  • Chunlin Wang
  • Tao Yu
  • Pengfei Li

Abstract

This paper develops semiparametric methods for estimation and inference of widely used inequality measures when survey data are subject to nonignorable nonresponse, a challenging setting in which response probabilities depend on the unobserved outcomes. Such nonresponse mechanisms are common in household surveys and invalidate standard inference procedures due to selection bias and lack of population representativeness. We address this problem by exploiting callback data from repeated contact attempts and adopting a semiparametric model that leaves the outcome distribution unspecified. We construct semiparametric full-likelihood estimators for the underlying distribution and the associated inequality measures, and establish their large-sample properties for a broad class of functionals, including quantiles, the Theil index, and the Gini index. Explicit asymptotic variance expressions are derived, enabling valid Wald-type inference under nonignorable nonresponse. To facilitate implementation, we propose a stable and computationally convenient expectation-maximization algorithm, whose steps either admit closed-form expressions or reduce to fitting a standard logistic regression model. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed procedures effectively correct nonresponse bias and achieve near-benchmark efficiency. An application to Consumer Expenditure Survey data illustrates the practical gains from incorporating callback information when making inference on inequality measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyu Wang & Chunlin Wang & Tao Yu & Pengfei Li, 2026. "Semiparametric inference for inequality measures under nonignorable nonresponse using callback data," Papers 2601.10501, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2601.10501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.10501
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davidson, Russell & Flachaire, Emmanuel, 2007. "Asymptotic and bootstrap inference for inequality and poverty measures," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 141-166, November.
    2. Jean-Marie Dufour & Emmanuel Flachaire & Lynda Khalaf, 2019. "Permutation Tests for Comparing Inequality Measures," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 457-470, July.
    3. Kristen Olson, 2013. "Paradata for Nonresponse Adjustment," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 645(1), pages 142-170, January.
    4. Luke A. Prendergast & Robert G. Staudte, 2017. "When large n is not enough – Distribution-free interval estimators for ratios of quantiles," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 15(3), pages 277-293, September.
    5. Jae Kwang Kim & Jongho Im, 2014. "Propensity score adjustment with several follow-ups," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(2), pages 439-448.
    6. Anton Korinek & Johan Mistiaen & Martin Ravallion, 2006. "Survey nonresponse and the distribution of income," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 4(1), pages 33-55, April.
    7. repec:bla:biomet:v:71:y:2015:i:4:p:1160-1167 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Zhong Guan & Denis H. Y. Leung & Jing Qin, 2018. "Semiparametric maximum likelihood inference for nonignorable nonresponse with callbacks," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 45(4), pages 962-984, December.
    9. Jing Qin & Dean A. Follmann, 2014. "Semiparametric maximum likelihood inference by using failed contact attempts to adjust for nonignorable nonresponse," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(4), pages 985-991.
    10. Christopher R. Bollinger & Barry T. Hirsch, 2013. "Is Earnings Nonresponse Ignorable?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(2), pages 407-416, May.
    11. Atkinson, Anthony B., 1970. "On the measurement of inequality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 244-263, September.
    12. repec:mpr:mprres:8160 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Luke A. Prendergast & Robert G. Staudte, 2017. "When large n is not enough – Distribution-free interval estimators for ratios of quantiles," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 15(3), pages 277-293, September.
    14. Korinek, Anton & Mistiaen, Johan A. & Ravallion, Martin, 2007. "An econometric method of correcting for unit nonresponse bias in surveys," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 213-235, January.
    15. Guillermo Paraje & Melvyn Weeks, 2010. "Income Nonresponse and Inequality Measurement," Revista de Analisis Economico – Economic Analysis Review, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business, vol. 25(2), pages 193-221, Diciembre.
    16. Giovanni Maria Giorgi & Chiara Gigliarano, 2017. "The Gini Concentration Index: A Review Of The Inference Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1130-1148, September.
    17. Feng, Shuaizhang & Burkhauser, Richard V. & Butler, J.S., 2006. "Levels and Long-Term Trends in Earnings Inequality: Overcoming Current Population Survey Censoring Problems Using the GB2 Distribution," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 24, pages 57-62, January.
    18. Meng Yuan & Pengfei Li & Changbao Wu, 2023. "Semi-parametric inference on Gini indices of two semi-continuous populations under density ratio models," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 26(2), pages 174-188.
    19. Gastwirth, Joseph L, 1972. "The Estimation of the Lorenz Curve and Gini Index," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 54(3), pages 306-316, August.
    20. Wang Miao & Peng Ding & Zhi Geng, 2016. "Identifiability of Normal and Normal Mixture Models with Nonignorable Missing Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1673-1683, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank Cowell & Emmanuel Flachaire, 2021. "Inequality Measurement: Methods and Data," Post-Print hal-03589066, HAL.
    2. Vladimir Hlasny & Paolo Verme, 2022. "The Impact of Top Incomes Biases on the Measurement of Inequality in the United States," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(4), pages 749-788, August.
    3. Vladimir Hlasny, 2021. "Parametric representation of the top of income distributions: Options, historical evidence, and model selection," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1217-1256, September.
    4. Vladimir Hlasny & Paolo Verme, 2018. "Top Incomes and Inequality Measurement: A Comparative Analysis of Correction Methods Using the EU SILC Data," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Arthur Charpentier & Emmanuel Flachaire, 2022. "Pareto models for top incomes and wealth," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 20(1), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Michele Lalla & Maddalena Cavicchioli, 2020. "Nonresponse and measurement errors in income: matching individual survey data with administrative tax data," Department of Economics 0170, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    7. Vladimir Hlasny, 2019. "Redistributive Impacts of Fiscal Policies in Mexico: Corrections for Top Income Measurement Problems," LIS Working papers 765, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    8. Vladimir Hlasny & Paolo Verme, 2018. "Top Incomes and the Measurement of Inequality in Egypt," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 32(2), pages 428-455.
    9. Arthur Charpentier & Emmanuel Flachaire, 2019. "Pareto Models for Top Incomes," Working Papers hal-02145024, HAL.
    10. Pinkovskiy, Maxim L., 2013. "World welfare is rising: Estimation using nonparametric bounds on welfare measures," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 176-195.
    11. Johannes Marzian & Julian Laabs & Johannes Müller & Tilman Requate, 2024. "Inequality in relational wealth within the upper societal segment: evidence from prehistoric Central Europe," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Victoria Danaan, 2018. "Analysing Poverty in Nigeria through Theoretical Lenses," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Cristina Barceló, 2008. "The impact of alternative imputation methods on the measurement of income and wealth: Evidence from the Spanish survey of household finances," Working Papers 0829, Banco de España.
    14. Schluter, Christian & van Garderen, Kees Jan, 2009. "Edgeworth expansions and normalizing transforms for inequality measures," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 16-29, May.
    15. Anton Korinek & Johan Mistiaen & Martin Ravallion, 2006. "Survey nonresponse and the distribution of income," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 4(1), pages 33-55, April.
    16. Pardy, Martina, 2025. "Multinationals and intra-regional innovation concentration," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 127983, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    17. Silvia De Nicol`o & Maria Rosaria Ferrante & Silvia Pacei, 2021. "Mind the Income Gap: Bias Correction of Inequality Estimators in Small-Sized Samples," Papers 2107.08950, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    18. Juan Luo & Bao-zhen Li, 2022. "Impact of Digital Financial Inclusion on Consumption Inequality in China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 529-553, September.
    19. Rafael Carranza & Marc Morgan & Brian Nolan, 2023. "Top Income Adjustments and Inequality: An Investigation of the EU‐SILC," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 69(3), pages 725-754, September.
    20. Markus P. A. Schneider, 2013. "Race & Gender Differences in the Experience of Earnings Inequality in the US from 1995 to 2010," Working Papers 1303, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2601.10501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.