IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2601.05728.html

Learning and Testing Exposure Mappings of Interference using Graph Convolutional Autoencoder

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Huber
  • Jannis Kueck
  • Mara Mattes

Abstract

Interference or spillover effects arise when an individual's outcome (e.g., health) is influenced not only by their own treatment (e.g., vaccination) but also by the treatment of others, creating challenges for evaluating treatment effects. Exposure mappings provide a framework to study such interference by explicitly modeling how the treatment statuses of contacts within an individual's network affect their outcome. Most existing research relies on a priori exposure mappings of limited complexity, which may fail to capture the full range of interference effects. In contrast, this study applies a graph convolutional autoencoder to learn exposure mappings in a data-driven way, which exploit dependencies and relations within a network to more accurately capture interference effects. As our main contribution, we introduce a machine learning-based test for the validity of exposure mappings and thus test the identification of the direct effect. In this testing approach, the learned exposure mapping is used as an instrument to test the validity of a simple, user-defined exposure mapping. The test leverages the fact that, if the user-defined exposure mapping is valid (so that all interference operates through it), then the learned exposure mapping is statistically independent of any individual's outcome, conditional on the user-defined exposure mapping. We assess the finite-sample performance of this proposed validity test through a simulation study.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Huber & Jannis Kueck & Mara Mattes, 2026. "Learning and Testing Exposure Mappings of Interference using Graph Convolutional Autoencoder," Papers 2601.05728, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2601.05728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.05728
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhewen Pan & Yifan Zhang, 2024. "Locally robust semiparametric estimation of sample selection models without exclusion restrictions," Papers 2412.01208, arXiv.org.
    2. Alexandre Belloni & Victor Chernozhukov & Christian Hansen, 2014. "Inference on Treatment Effects after Selection among High-Dimensional Controlsâ€," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 81(2), pages 608-650.
    3. Toru Kitagawa & Aleksey Tetenov, 2018. "Who Should Be Treated? Empirical Welfare Maximization Methods for Treatment Choice," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 591-616, March.
    4. Martin Huber & Jannis Kueck, 2022. "Testing the identification of causal effects in observational data," Papers 2203.15890, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    5. Michael P. Leung, 2022. "Causal Inference Under Approximate Neighborhood Interference," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(1), pages 267-293, January.
    6. Hudgens, Michael G. & Halloran, M. Elizabeth, 2008. "Toward Causal Inference With Interference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 832-842, June.
    7. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Mert Demirer & Esther Duflo & Christian Hansen & Whitney Newey & James Robins, 2018. "Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 21(1), pages 1-68, February.
    8. Yike Wang & Chris Gu & Taisuke Otsu, 2024. "Graph Neural Networks: Theory for Estimation with Application on Network Heterogeneity," Papers 2401.16275, arXiv.org.
    9. Susan Athey & Stefan Wager, 2021. "Policy Learning With Observational Data," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(1), pages 133-161, January.
    10. Keisuke Hirano & Jack R. Porter, 2009. "Asymptotics for Statistical Treatment Rules," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(5), pages 1683-1701, September.
    11. Charles F. Manski, 2004. "Statistical Treatment Rules for Heterogeneous Populations," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1221-1246, July.
    12. de Luna Xavier & Johansson Per, 2014. "Testing for the Unconfoundedness Assumption Using an Instrumental Assumption," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 187-199, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Achim Ahrens & Alessandra Stampi‐Bombelli & Selina Kurer & Dominik Hangartner, 2024. "Optimal multi‐action treatment allocation: A two‐phase field experiment to boost immigrant naturalization," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(7), pages 1379-1395, November.
    2. Henrika Langen & Martin Huber, 2023. "How causal machine learning can leverage marketing strategies: Assessing and improving the performance of a coupon campaign," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-37, January.
    3. Yuehao Bai & Azeem M. Shaikh & Max Tabord-Meehan, 2024. "A Primer on the Analysis of Randomized Experiments and a Survey of some Recent Advances," Papers 2405.03910, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    4. Justin Whitehouse & Qizhao Chen & Morgane Austern & Vasilis Syrgkanis, 2025. "Inference on Optimal Policy Values and Other Irregular Functionals via Softmax Smoothing," Papers 2507.11780, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    5. Kyle Colangelo & Ying-Ying Lee, 2019. "Double debiased machine learning nonparametric inference with continuous treatments," CeMMAP working papers CWP72/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Nan Liu & Yanbo Liu & Yuya Sasaki & Yuanyuan Wan, 2025. "Nonparametric Uniform Inference in Binary Classification and Policy Values," Working Papers tecipa-811, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    7. Kyle Colangelo & Ying-Ying Lee, 2020. "Double Debiased Machine Learning Nonparametric Inference with Continuous Treatments," Papers 2004.03036, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    8. Michael C Knaus, 2022. "Double machine learning-based programme evaluation under unconfoundedness [Econometric methods for program evaluation]," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 25(3), pages 602-627.
    9. Nora Bearth & Michael Lechner & Jana Mareckova & Fabian Muny, 2025. "Fairness-Aware and Interpretable Policy Learning," Papers 2509.12119, arXiv.org.
    10. Ayush Sawarni & Jikai Jin & Justin Whitehouse & Vasilis Syrgkanis, 2025. "Policy Learning with Abstention," Papers 2510.19672, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    11. Alejandro Sanchez-Becerra, 2023. "Robust inference for the treatment effect variance in experiments using machine learning," Papers 2306.03363, arXiv.org.
    12. Augustine Denteh & Helge Liebert, 2022. "Who Increases Emergency Department Use? New Insights from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 9664, CESifo.
    13. Davide Viviano & Jess Rudder, 2020. "Policy design in experiments with unknown interference," Papers 2011.08174, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    14. Martin Huber, 2019. "An introduction to flexible methods for policy evaluation," Papers 1910.00641, arXiv.org.
    15. Giovanni Cerulli & Francesco Caracciolo, 2025. "Risk-Adjusted Policy Learning and the Social Cost of Uncertainty: Theory and Evidence from CAP evaluation," Papers 2510.05007, arXiv.org.
    16. Garbero, Alessandra & Sakos, Grayson & Cerulli, Giovanni, 2023. "Towards data-driven project design: Providing optimal treatment rules for development projects," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    17. Undral Byambadalai, 2022. "Identification and Inference for Welfare Gains without Unconfoundedness," Papers 2207.04314, arXiv.org.
    18. Yuchen Hu & Henry Zhu & Emma Brunskill & Stefan Wager, 2024. "Minimax-Regret Sample Selection in Randomized Experiments," Papers 2403.01386, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    19. Davide Viviano & Kaspar Wuthrich & Paul Niehaus, 2021. "A model of multiple hypothesis testing," Papers 2104.13367, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    20. Shosei Sakaguchi, 2021. "Estimation of Optimal Dynamic Treatment Assignment Rules under Policy Constraints," Papers 2106.05031, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2601.05728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.