IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2601.01642.html

Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Rare-Event Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Dohyun Ahn
  • Huiyi Chen
  • Lewen Zheng

Abstract

Standard rare-event simulation techniques require exact distributional specifications, which limits their effectiveness in the presence of distributional uncertainty. To address this, we develop a novel framework for estimating rare-event probabilities subject to such distributional model risk. Specifically, we focus on computing worst-case rare-event probabilities, defined as a distributionally robust bound against a Wasserstein ambiguity set centered at a specific nominal distribution. By exploiting a dual characterization of this bound, we propose Distributionally Robust Importance Sampling (DRIS), a computationally tractable methodology designed to substantially reduce the variance associated with estimating the dual components. The proposed method is simple to implement and requires low sampling costs. Most importantly, it achieves vanishing relative error, the strongest efficiency guarantee that is notoriously difficult to establish in rare-event simulation. Our numerical studies confirm the superior performance of DRIS against existing benchmarks.

Suggested Citation

  • Dohyun Ahn & Huiyi Chen & Lewen Zheng, 2026. "Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Rare-Event Simulation," Papers 2601.01642, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2601.01642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.01642
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shengyi He & Guangxin Jiang & Henry Lam & Michael C. Fu, 2024. "Adaptive Importance Sampling for Efficient Stochastic Root Finding and Quantile Estimation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(6), pages 2612-2630, November.
    2. Achal Bassamboo & Sandeep Juneja & Assaf Zeevi, 2008. "Portfolio Credit Risk with Extremal Dependence: Asymptotic Analysis and Efficient Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 593-606, June.
    3. Jose Blanchet & Henry Lam, 2014. "Rare-Event Simulation for Many-Server Queues," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 1142-1178, November.
    4. Anand Deo & Karthyek Murthy, 2025. "Achieving Efficiency in Black-Box Simulation of Distribution Tails with Self-Structuring Importance Samplers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(1), pages 325-343, January.
    5. Paul Glasserman & Wanmo Kang & Perwez Shahabuddin, 2008. "Fast Simulation of Multifactor Portfolio Credit Risk," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(5), pages 1200-1217, October.
    6. Henry Lam & Clementine Mottet, 2017. "Tail Analysis Without Parametric Models: A Worst-Case Perspective," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1696-1711, December.
    7. Paul Glasserman & Philip Heidelberger & Perwez Shahabuddin, 2000. "Variance Reduction Techniques for Estimating Value-at-Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(10), pages 1349-1364, October.
    8. Z. I. Botev, 2017. "The normal law under linear restrictions: simulation and estimation via minimax tilting," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(1), pages 125-148, January.
    9. Jose Blanchet & Karthyek Murthy, 2019. "Quantifying Distributional Model Risk via Optimal Transport," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 565-600, May.
    10. Yuhong Xu, 2014. "Robust valuation and risk measurement under model uncertainty," Papers 1407.8024, arXiv.org.
    11. Paul Glasserman & Xingbo Xu, 2014. "Robust risk measurement and model risk," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 29-58, January.
    12. Luhao Zhang & Jincheng Yang & Rui Gao, 2025. "A Short and General Duality Proof for Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(4), pages 2146-2155, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Birghila, Corina & Aigner, Maximilian & Engelke, Sebastian, 2025. "Distributionally robust tail bounds based on Wasserstein distance and f-divergence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    2. Anand Deo, 2025. "EVT-Based Rate-Preserving Distributional Robustness for Tail Risk Functionals," Papers 2506.16230, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    3. Aleksandrina Goeva & Henry Lam & Huajie Qian & Bo Zhang, 2019. "Optimization-Based Calibration of Simulation Input Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1362-1382, September.
    4. Guanyu Jin & Roger J. A. Laeven & Dick den Hertog & Aharon Ben-Tal, 2024. "Constructing Uncertainty Sets for Robust Risk Measures: A Composition of $\phi$-Divergences Approach to Combat Tail Uncertainty," Papers 2412.05234, arXiv.org.
    5. Anthony Coache & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2024. "Robust Reinforcement Learning with Dynamic Distortion Risk Measures," Papers 2409.10096, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    6. Kim, Sojung & Weber, Stefan, 2022. "Simulation methods for robust risk assessment and the distorted mix approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 380-398.
    7. Carole Bernard & Silvana M. Pesenti & Steven Vanduffel, 2024. "Robust distortion risk measures," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 774-818, July.
    8. Rongda Chen & Ze Wang & Lean Yu, 2017. "Importance Sampling for Credit Portfolio Risk with Risk Factors Having t-Copula," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1101-1124, July.
    9. Lux, Thibaut & Papapantoleon, Antonis, 2019. "Model-free bounds on Value-at-Risk using extreme value information and statistical distances," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 73-83.
    10. Guangxin Jiang & L. Jeff Hong & Barry L. Nelson, 2020. "Online Risk Monitoring Using Offline Simulation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 356-375, April.
    11. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    12. Thibaut Lux & Antonis Papapantoleon, 2016. "Model-free bounds on Value-at-Risk using extreme value information and statistical distances," Papers 1610.09734, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2018.
    13. Hengxin Cui & Ken Seng Tan & Fan Yang, 2024. "Portfolio credit risk with Archimedean copulas: asymptotic analysis and efficient simulation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 332(1), pages 55-84, January.
    14. Aleksandra Pasieczna-Dixit, 2025. "How reliable are systemic risk measures? Model risk estimates of MES and ΔCoVaR," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 56(4), pages 463-496.
    15. Mingbin Ben Feng & Eunhye Song, 2020. "Efficient Nested Simulation Experiment Design via the Likelihood Ratio Method," Papers 2008.13087, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    16. Spiridon Penev & Pavel Shevchenko & Wei Wu, 2019. "Myopic robust index tracking with Bregman divergence," Papers 1908.07659, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    17. Paul Glasserman & Wanmo Kang, 2014. "OR Forum—Design of Risk Weights," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1204-1220, December.
    18. Steven Kou & Xianhua Peng, 2016. "On the Measurement of Economic Tail Risk," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 1056-1072, October.
    19. Huang, Zhenzhen & Kwok, Yue Kuen & Xu, Ziqing, 2024. "Efficient algorithms for calculating risk measures and risk contributions in copula credit risk models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 132-150.
    20. Volk-Makarewicz, Warren & Borovkova, Svetlana & Heidergott, Bernd, 2022. "Assessing the impact of jumps in an option pricing model: A gradient estimation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 740-751.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2601.01642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.