IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2512.21553.html

Legacy Lending Relationships and Credit Rationing: Evidence from the Paycheck Protection Program

Author

Listed:
  • Chunyu Qu

Abstract

This article examines how legacy lending relationships shape the allocation of emergency credit under severe information frictions. Using a novel dataset linking Small Business Administration (SBA) loan records with Dun and Bradstreet microdata for over 26 million U.S. firms, I investigate whether prior participation in the SBA 7(a) program acted as a gateway to the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). Employing entropy balancing to construct a strictly comparable counterfactual group, I document a distinct dynamic evolution in credit rationing. In the program's initial "panic phase" in April 2020, banks relied heavily on legacy ties as a screening technology: firms with prior 7(a) relationships were approximately 29 percentage points more likely to receive funding than observationally identical non-7(a) firms. By June 2021, however, this insider advantage had largely vanished, suggesting that policy adjustments and extended timelines eventually mitigated the initial intermediation frictions. These findings highlight a fundamental trade-off between speed and equity in crisis response. While leveraging existing credit rails accelerates deployment, it systematically excludes informationally opaque borrowers. I discuss policy implications for designing future digital infrastructure to decouple verification from historical lending relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Chunyu Qu, 2025. "Legacy Lending Relationships and Credit Rationing: Evidence from the Paycheck Protection Program," Papers 2512.21553, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2512.21553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.21553
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2512.21553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.