IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2512.03812.html

Minimum Wages, Firm Size Distribution, and the Labor Share

Author

Listed:
  • Jiyuan Lyu

Abstract

The sustained decline of the labor share challenges the classic Kaldor facts. This paper proposes a ``weighting effect'' mechanism: because large firms systematically adopt more capital-intensive technologies, a shift of economic activity toward large firms mechanically depresses the macro labor share, even under perfect competition. We test this mechanism by exploiting minimum wage hikes in China as an exogenous shock that forces small labor-intensive firms to exit. Using the Chinese Annual Survey of Industrial Firms (1998--2007) and a Bartik instrument based on pre-sample small-firm shares interacted with provincial minimum wage growth, we find that a one-standard-deviation shock reduces the market-level labor share by approximately 0.11 percentage points (3.5\% of the mean). The effect is robust to controlling for market concentration, alternative measures, and a battery of placebo tests including randomization inference. Direct mechanism tests confirm that the shock raises exit rates, reduces the number and share of small firms, and reallocates output toward large, capital-intensive firms. Supplementary IV estimates confirm that a more equal firm size distribution raises the labor share. The findings identify a complete causal chain from labor market institutions to macro distribution through the firm size structure, offering a ``technology-structure'' channel that is independent of market power.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiyuan Lyu, 2025. "Minimum Wages, Firm Size Distribution, and the Labor Share," Papers 2512.03812, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2512.03812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.03812
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2018. "The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(6), pages 1488-1542, June.
    2. Gabaix, Xavier & Ibragimov, Rustam, 2011. "Rank − 1 / 2: A Simple Way to Improve the OLS Estimation of Tail Exponents," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 29(1), pages 24-39.
    3. Chang-Tai Hsieh & Peter J. Klenow, 2009. "Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 124(4), pages 1403-1448.
    4. Brent Neiman, 2014. "The Global Decline of the Labor Share," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(1), pages 61-103.
    5. Xavier Gabaix & Rustam Ibragimov, 2011. "Rank - 1 / 2: A Simple Way to Improve the OLS Estimation of Tail Exponents," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 24-39, January.
    6. Per Krusell & Lee E. Ohanian & JosÈ-Victor RÌos-Rull & Giovanni L. Violante, 2000. "Capital-Skill Complementarity and Inequality: A Macroeconomic Analysis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(5), pages 1029-1054, September.
    7. Jan De Loecker & Jan Eeckhout & Gabriel Unger, 2020. "The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications [“Econometric Tools for Analyzing Market Outcomes”]," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(2), pages 561-644.
    8. H. S. Houthakker, 1955. "The Pareto Distribution and the Cobb-Douglas Production Function in Activity Analysis," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 23(1), pages 27-31.
    9. Xavier Gabaix, 2011. "The Granular Origins of Aggregate Fluctuations," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 733-772, May.
    10. Matthias Kehrig & Nicolas Vincent, 2021. "The Micro-Level Anatomy of the Labor Share Decline," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(2), pages 1031-1087.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiyuan Lyu, 2026. "Minimum Wages, Firm Size Distribution, and the Labor Share," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 16(5), pages 1-3.
    2. Xu, Yuanbin & Wei, Yuan & Zeng, Xin & Yu, Haiqing & Chen, Hongjie, 2024. "Big data development and labor income share: Evidence from China's national big data comprehensive pilot zones," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1415-1437.
    3. David Rezza Baqaee & Emmanuel Farhi, 2020. "Productivity and Misallocation in General Equilibrium," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(1), pages 105-163.
    4. Kerspien, Jacob & Madsen, Jakob B. & Strulik, Holger, 2026. "Capital composition and the decline of the labor share: Why buildings matter," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    5. Mayneris, Florian, 2025. "Does the urban wage premium imply a higher firms’ labor share in big cities?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Kudoh, Noritaka & Miyamoto, Hiroaki, 2025. "Robots, AI, and unemployment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Stiebale, Joel & Suedekum, Jens & Woessner, Nicole, 2024. "Robots and the rise of European superstar firms," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    8. Simcha Barkai & Surech Nallareddy & Maria Ogneva, 2025. "Capitalization of Intellectual Property Products Does Not Explain the Decline in the Labor Share," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 56, April.
    9. David Autor & Caroline Chin & Anna M. Salomons & Bryan Seegmiller, 2026. "What Makes New Work Different from More Work?," NBER Working Papers 34986, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Roya Taherifar & Mark J. Holmes & Gazi M. Hassan, 2023. "The drivers of labour share and impact on pay inequality: A firm-level investigation," Working Papers in Economics 23/03, University of Waikato.
    11. Kraft, Kornelius & Lammers, Alexander, 2021. "Bargaining Power and the Labor Share - a Structural Break Approach," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242342, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    12. Drago Bergholt & Francesco Furlanetto & Nicolò Maffei-Faccioli, 2022. "The Decline of the Labor Share: New Empirical Evidence," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 163-198, July.
    13. Panon, Ludovic, 2022. "Labor share, foreign demand and superstar exporters," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    14. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/5j3i17uo7399t940lrt6h6n545 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Yang, Guang-Zhao & Si, Deng-Kui & Ning, Guang-Jie, 2023. "Does digital transformation reduce the labor income share in enterprises?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1526-1538.
    16. Jakob Grazzini & Lorenza Rossi, 2020. "New Firms, Capital Intensity and the Labor Share: New Theoretical and Empirical Insights," CESifo Working Paper Series 8255, CESifo.
    17. Amendola, Marco & Ciampa, Valerio & Germani, Lorenzo, 2024. "The distributional effects of labour market deregulation: Wage share and fixed-term contracts," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 328-338.
    18. Geoff Weir, 2018. "Wage Growth Puzzles and Technology," RBA Research Discussion Papers rdp2018-10, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    19. Rafael Guntin & Federico Kochen, 2025. "The Origins of Top Firms," Working Papers wp2025_2516, CEMFI.
    20. Tomás N. Rotta, 2025. "Intellectual Monopoly and Income Inequality in the United States, 1948–2021: A Long-Run Analysis," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 57(4), pages 826-849, December.
    21. Maya Eden & Paul Gaggl, 2019. "Capital Composition and the Declining Labor Share," CESifo Working Paper Series 7996, CESifo.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2512.03812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.