IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2512.01623.html

Monopoly Pricing of Weather Index Insurance

Author

Listed:
  • Tim J. Boonen
  • Wenyuan Li
  • Zixiao Quan

Abstract

This study models the monopoly pricing of weather index insurance as a Bowley-type sequential game involving a profit-maximizing insurer (leader) and a farmer (follower). The farmer chooses an insurance payoff to minimize a convex distortion risk measure, while the insurer anticipates this best response and selects a premium principle and its parameters to maximize profit net of administrative costs. For the insurer, we adopt three different premium-principle parameterizations: (i) an expected premium with a single risk-loading factor, (ii) a two-parameter distortion premium based on a power transform, and (iii) a fully flexible pricing kernel drawn from the general Choquet integral representation with nondecreasing distortions. For the farmer, we model index payoffs using neural networks and compare solutions under fully connected architectures with those under convolutional neural networks (CNNs). We solve the game using a penalized bilevel programming algorithm that employs a function-value-gap penalty and delivers convergence guarantees without requiring the lower-level objective to be strongly convex. Based on Iowa's soybean yields and high-dimensional PRISM weather data, we find that CNN-based designs yield smoother, less noisy payoffs that reduce basis risk and push insurer profits closer to indemnity insurance levels. Moreover, expanding pricing flexibility from a single loading to a two-parameter distortion premium, and ultimately to a flexible pricing kernel, systematically increases equilibrium profits.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim J. Boonen & Wenyuan Li & Zixiao Quan, 2025. "Monopoly Pricing of Weather Index Insurance," Papers 2512.01623, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2512.01623
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.01623
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim J. Boonen & Ka Chun Cheung & Yiying Zhang, 2021. "Bowley reinsurance with asymmetric information on the insurer's risk preferences," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2021(7), pages 623-644, August.
    2. Chan, Fung-Yee & Gerber, Hans U., 1985. "The Reinsurer's Monopoly and the Bowley Solution," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 141-148, November.
    3. Milton Boyd & Brock Porth & Lysa Porth & Ken Seng Tan & Shuo Wang & Wenjun Zhu, 2020. "The Design of Weather Index Insurance Using Principal Component Regression and Partial Least Squares Regression: The Case of Forage Crops," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 355-369, July.
    4. Cai, Jun & Tan, Ken Seng & Weng, Chengguo & Zhang, Yi, 2008. "Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CTE risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 185-196, August.
    5. Boonen, Tim J., 2015. "Competitive Equilibria With Distortion Risk Measures," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(3), pages 703-728, September.
    6. Tim J. Boonen & Wenjun Jiang, 2024. "Bowley Insurance with Expected Utility Maximization of the Policyholders," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 407-425, April.
    7. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    8. Chen, Yanhong & Cheung, Ka Chun & Zhang, Yiying, 2024. "Bowley solution under the reinsurer's default risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 36-61.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghossoub, Mario & Zhu, Michael B., 2024. "Stackelberg equilibria with multiple policyholders," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 189-201.
    2. Boonen, Tim J. & Ghossoub, Mario, 2023. "Bowley vs. Pareto optima in reinsurance contracting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 382-391.
    3. Chen, Yanhong & Cheung, Ka Chun & Zhang, Yiying, 2024. "Bowley solution under the reinsurer's default risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 36-61.
    4. Boonen, Tim J. & Liu, Fangda, 2022. "Insurance with heterogeneous preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Schumacher Johannes M., 2018. "Distortion risk measures, ROC curves, and distortion divergence," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 35(1-2), pages 35-50, January.
    6. Balbás, Alejandro & Balbás, Beatriz & Heras, Antonio, 2011. "Stable solutions for optimal reinsurance problems involving risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 796-804, November.
    7. Boonen, Tim J. & Han, Xia, 2024. "Optimal insurance with mean-deviation measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-24.
    8. Gabriela Zeller & Matthias Scherer, 2023. "Risk mitigation services in cyber insurance: optimal contract design and price structure," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 48(2), pages 502-547, April.
    9. Wang, Ching-Ping & Huang, Hung-Hsi, 2016. "Optimal insurance contract under VaR and CVaR constraints," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 110-127.
    10. Brandtner, Mario, 2018. "Expected Shortfall, spectral risk measures, and the aggravating effect of background risk, or: risk vulnerability and the problem of subadditivity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 138-149.
    11. Alejandro Balbas & Beatriz Balbas & Raquel Balbas, 2013. "Optimal Reinsurance: A Risk Sharing Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-12, August.
    12. Guerra, Manuel & Centeno, M.L., 2012. "Are quantile risk measures suitable for risk-transfer decisions?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 446-461.
    13. Meng-Jou Lu & Matúš Horváth & Xingjia Wang & Wolfgang Karl Härdle, 2025. "Spectral risk for digital assets," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 537-574, February.
    14. Ghossoub, Mario & Li, Bin & Shi, Benxuan, 2025. "Bowley-optimal convex-loaded premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 157-180.
    15. Chi, Yichun & Liu, Fangda, 2017. "Optimal insurance design in the presence of exclusion clauses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 185-195.
    16. Yinzhi Wang & Erik B{o}lviken, 2019. "How much is optimal reinsurance degraded by error?," Papers 1912.04175, arXiv.org.
    17. Brandtner, Mario & Kürsten, Wolfgang & Rischau, Robert, 2020. "Beyond expected utility: Subjective risk aversion and optimal portfolio choice under convex shortfall risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 1114-1126.
    18. Chi, Yichun & Weng, Chengguo, 2013. "Optimal reinsurance subject to Vajda condition," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 179-189.
    19. Boonen, Tim J., 2017. "Risk Redistribution Games With Dual Utilities," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(1), pages 303-329, January.
    20. Bensalem, Sarah & Santibáñez, Nicolás Hernández & Kazi-Tani, Nabil, 2020. "Prevention efforts, insurance demand and price incentives under coherent risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 369-386.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2512.01623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.