IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2511.22839.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Can industrial overcapacity enable seasonal flexibility in electricity use? A case study of aluminum smelting in China

Author

Listed:
  • Ruike Lyu
  • Anna Li
  • Jianxiao Wang
  • Hongxi Luo
  • Yan Shen
  • Hongye Guo
  • Ershun Du
  • Chongqing Kang
  • Jesse Jenkins

Abstract

In many countries, declining demand in energy-intensive industries (EIIs) such as cement, steel, and aluminum is leading to industrial overcapacity. Although overcapacity is traditionally seen as problematic, it could unlock EIIs' flexibility in electricity use. Using China's aluminum smelting sector as a case, we evaluate the system-level cost-benefit of retaining EII overcapacity for flexible electricity use in decarbonized systems. We find that overcapacity enables smelters to adopt a seasonal operation paradigm, ceasing production during winter load peaks driven by heating electrification and renewable seasonality. In a 2050-net-zero scenario, this paradigm reduces China's electricity-system investment and operating costs by 15-72 billion CNY per year (8-34% of the industry's product value), enough to offset the costs of maintaining overcapacity and product storage. Seasonal operation also cuts workforce fluctuations across aluminum smelting and thermal-power sectors by up to 62%, potentially mitigating socio-economic disruptions from industrial restructuring and the energy transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruike Lyu & Anna Li & Jianxiao Wang & Hongxi Luo & Yan Shen & Hongye Guo & Ershun Du & Chongqing Kang & Jesse Jenkins, 2025. "Can industrial overcapacity enable seasonal flexibility in electricity use? A case study of aluminum smelting in China," Papers 2511.22839, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.22839
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.22839
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.22839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.