IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2511.11862.html

Compound Selection Decisions: An Almost SURE Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jiafeng Chen
  • Lihua Lei
  • Timothy Sudijono
  • Liyang Sun
  • Tian Xie

Abstract

This paper proposes methods for producing compound selection decisions in a Gaussian sequence model. Given unknown, fixed parameters $\mu_ {1:n}$ and known $\sigma_{1:n}$ with observations $Y_i \sim \textsf{N}(\mu_i, \sigma_i^2)$, the decision maker would like to select a subset of indices $S$ so as to maximize utility $\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i\in S} (\mu_i - K_i)$, for known costs $K_i$. Inspired by Stein's unbiased risk estimate (SURE), we introduce an almost unbiased estimator, called ASSURE, for the expected utility of a proposed decision rule. ASSURE allows a user to choose a welfare-maximizing rule from a pre-specified class by optimizing the estimated welfare, thereby producing selection decisions that borrow strength across noisy estimates. We show that ASSURE produces decision rules that are asymptotically no worse than the optimal but infeasible decision rule in the pre-specified class. We apply ASSURE to the selection of Census tracts for economic opportunity, the identification of discriminating firms, and the analysis of $p$-value decision procedures in A/B testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiafeng Chen & Lihua Lei & Timothy Sudijono & Liyang Sun & Tian Xie, 2025. "Compound Selection Decisions: An Almost SURE Approach," Papers 2511.11862, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.11862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.11862
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isaiah Andrews & Toru Kitagawa & Adam McCloskey, 2024. "Inference on Winners," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 139(1), pages 305-358.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David J. Deming, 2021. "The Growing Importance of Decision-Making on the Job," NBER Working Papers 28733, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Seungjin Han & Julius Owusu & Youngki Shin, 2026. "Ranking Treatment Saturations under Clustered Network Interference," Papers 2606.18590, arXiv.org.
    3. Jiafeng Chen, 2021. "Nonparametric Treatment Effect Identification in School Choice," Papers 2112.03872, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    4. Reca Sarfati & Vod Vilfort, 2026. "Integrating Diagnostic Checks into Estimation," Papers 2604.16690, arXiv.org.
    5. Kirk Bansak & Elisabeth Paulson & Dominik Rothenhausler & Jeremy Ferwerda & Jens Hainmueller & Michael Hotard, 2026. "Robustness of Refugee-Matching Gains to Off-Policy Evaluation Choices," Papers 2605.06686, arXiv.org.
    6. Dominic Coey & Kenneth Hung, 2022. "Empirical Bayes Selection for Value Maximization," Papers 2210.03905, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    7. Bazylik, Sergei & Mogstad, Magne & Romano, Joseph P. & Shaikh, Azeem M. & Wilhelm, Daniel, 2025. "Finite- and large-sample inference for ranks using multinomial data with an application to ranking political parties," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    8. Reca Sarfati & Vod Vilfort, 2025. ""Post" Pre-Analysis Plans: Valid Inference for Non-Preregistered Specifications," Papers 2510.02507, arXiv.org.
    9. Isaiah Andrews & Jiafeng Chen, 2025. "Certified Decisions," Papers 2502.17830, arXiv.org.
    10. Andrews, Isaiah & Kitagawa, Toru & McCloskey, Adam, 2021. "Inference after estimation of breaks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 39-59.
    11. Oguzhan Akgun & Ryo Okui, 2025. "Robust Inference Methods for Latent Group Panel Models under Possible Group Non-Separation," Papers 2511.18550, arXiv.org.
    12. Davide Viviano & Jelena Bradic, 2020. "Fair Policy Targeting," Papers 2005.12395, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.
    13. Davide Viviano & Jess Rudder, 2020. "Policy design in experiments with unknown interference," Papers 2011.08174, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    14. Hsieh, Yu-Wei & Shi, Xiaoxia & Shum, Matthew, 2022. "Inference on estimators defined by mathematical programming," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 226(2), pages 248-268.
    15. Emily Breza & Arun G. Chandrasekhar & Davide Viviano, 2025. "Evidence aggregation with ignorance in mind: learning what we do (not) know for archetypes discovery," Papers 2501.13355, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    16. Magne Mogstad & Joseph P Romano & Azeem M Shaikh & Daniel Wilhelm, 2024. "Inference for Ranks with Applications to Mobility across Neighbourhoods and Academic Achievement across Countries," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(1), pages 476-518.
    17. repec:arx:papers:2411.16552 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Anya Shchetkina, 2025. "Blind Targeting: Personalization under Third-Party Privacy Constraints," Papers 2507.05175, arXiv.org.
    19. Isaiah Andrews & Jonathan Roth & Ariel Pakes, 2023. "Inference for Linear Conditional Moment Inequalities," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(6), pages 2763-2791.
    20. Wei, Waverly & Zhou, Yuqing & Zheng, Zeyu & Wang, Jingshen, 2024. "Inference on the best policies with many covariates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 239(2).
    21. Jean-Pierre Dubé & Ariel Xu, 2026. "Large Language Models and Creative Content Design: a case study of email marketing at Wine Access," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1-28, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.11862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.