IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2510.26627.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Probabilistic Rule Models as Diagnostic Layers: Interpreting Structural Concept Drift in Post-Crisis Finance

Author

Listed:
  • Dmitry Lesnik
  • Tobias Schaefer

Abstract

Machine learning models used for high-stakes predictions in domains like credit risk face critical degradation due to concept drift, requiring robust and transparent adaptation mechanisms. We propose an architecture, where a dedicated correction layer is employed to efficiently capture systematic shifts in predictive scores when a model becomes outdated. The key element of this architecture is the design of a correction layer using Probabilistic Rule Models (PRMs) based on Markov Logic Networks, which guarantees intrinsic interpretability through symbolic, auditable rules. This structure transforms the correction layer from a simple scoring mechanism into a powerful diagnostic tool capable of isolating and explaining the fundamental changes in borrower riskiness. We illustrate this diagnostic capability using Fannie Mae mortgage data, demonstrating how the interpretable rules extracted by the correction layer successfully explain the structural impact of the 2008 financial crisis on specific population segments, providing essential insights for portfolio risk management and regulatory compliance.

Suggested Citation

  • Dmitry Lesnik & Tobias Schaefer, 2025. "Probabilistic Rule Models as Diagnostic Layers: Interpreting Structural Concept Drift in Post-Crisis Finance," Papers 2510.26627, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.26627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.26627
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.26627. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.