IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2510.09109.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sensitivity Analysis for Causal ML: A Use Case at Booking.com

Author

Listed:
  • Philipp Bach
  • Victor Chernozhukov
  • Carlos Cinelli
  • Lin Jia
  • Sven Klaassen
  • Nils Skotara
  • Martin Spindler

Abstract

Causal Machine Learning has emerged as a powerful tool for flexibly estimating causal effects from observational data in both industry and academia. However, causal inference from observational data relies on untestable assumptions about the data-generating process, such as the absence of unobserved confounders. When these assumptions are violated, causal effect estimates may become biased, undermining the validity of research findings. In these contexts, sensitivity analysis plays a crucial role, by enabling data scientists to assess the robustness of their findings to plausible violations of unconfoundedness. This paper introduces sensitivity analysis and demonstrates its practical relevance through a (simulated) data example based on a use case at Booking.com. We focus our presentation on a recently proposed method by Chernozhukov et al. (2023), which derives general non-parametric bounds on biases due to omitted variables, and is fully compatible with (though not limited to) modern inferential tools of Causal Machine Learning. By presenting this use case, we aim to raise awareness of sensitivity analysis and highlight its importance in real-world scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Philipp Bach & Victor Chernozhukov & Carlos Cinelli & Lin Jia & Sven Klaassen & Nils Skotara & Martin Spindler, 2025. "Sensitivity Analysis for Causal ML: A Use Case at Booking.com," Papers 2510.09109, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.09109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.09109
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2510.09109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.